FTMHvsFTMSETF Comparison
Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF (FTMS) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. FTMH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.22% for FTMS. FTMH is down -1.4% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. FTMS performs better with -0.2% YTD performance, and +$30M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTMH and FTMS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FTMH vs FTMS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTMH FTMS | -1.42%-0.13% | -3.09%-0.55% | -1.40%-0.20% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FTMH FTMS | +$13M-$2M | +$9M+$9M | +$41M+$30M | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTMH FTMS | +4.15%+1.40% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FTMH FTMS | -4.41%-0.91% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FTMH FTMS | 63d63d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
FTMH | FTMS | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $11.35 | $9.87 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $11.38 | $9.87 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FTMH | FTMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $11.35 | $9.87 |
| 1D performance | -0.22% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $567.94 M | $190.30 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.22% |
FTMH | FTMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 96 | 48 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 24, 2025 | October 24, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
