FTMHvsDFNMETF Comparison
Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF (DFNM) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. FTMH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.18% for DFNM. FTMH is down -4.72% year-to-date (YTD) with +$137M in YTD flows. DFNM performs better with -1% YTD performance, and +$360M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTMH and DFNM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FTMH vs DFNM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTMH DFNM | -1.47%+0.02% | -6.56%-2.31% | -4.72%-1.00% | n/a-0.15% | n/a+9.22% | n/an/a |
| Flows | FTMH DFNM | +$92M-$35M | +$87M+$41M | +$137M+$360M | -+$562M | -+$1.29B | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTMH DFNM | +6.61%+3.59% | n/a+2.20% | n/a+2.31% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FTMH DFNM | -8.53%-4.26% | n/a-4.56% | n/a-4.56% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FTMH DFNM | 92d92d | n/a101d | n/a101d | n/an/a |
FTMH | DFNM | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $10.97 | $46.71 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $10.97 | $46.71 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FTMH | DFNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $10.97 | $46.71 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $646.36 M | $2.22 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.18% |
FTMH | DFNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | Dimensional |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 96 | 259 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 24, 2025 | November 15, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
