FTGCvsBCIETF Comparison
ETF 1
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
+0.19%
VS
ETF 2
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
+0.19%
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund ETF (FTGC) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Commodity. FTGC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.98%, versus 0.26% for BCI. FTGC is up 33.59% year-to-date (YTD) with +$942M in YTD flows. BCI performs worse with 32.38% YTD performance, and +$1.02B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTGC and BCI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FTGC vs BCI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTGC BCI | -0.59%+0.40% | +4.95%+7.79% | +33.59%+32.38% | +36.29%+36.69% | +57.00%+52.55% | +80.32%+61.53% |
| Flows | FTGC BCI | +$80M+$52M | +$237M+$257M | +$942M+$1.02B | +$862M+$1.16B | +$153M+$2.04B | +$1.08B+$2.35B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTGC BCI | +10.18%+11.72% | +15.58%+17.95% | +13.56%+14.50% | +15.02%+16.45% |
| Max drawdown | FTGC BCI | -3.96%-3.87% | -12.01%-14.33% | -12.01%-14.33% | -20.71%-26.07% |
| Max drawdown duration | FTGC BCI | 49d44d | 98d105d | 98d105d | 1324d1323d |
Trading data
FTGC | BCI | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 7:47 PM | $29.60 | $25.24 |
| Previous close 10/30/2026 | $30.12 | $25.74 |
| Consolidated volume 10/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FTGC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFTGC | BCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 7:47 PM
Live
Closed
FTGC | BCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.60 | $25.24 |
| 1D performance | -1.73% | -1.94% |
| AuM | $3.37 B | $3.47 B |
| E/R | 0.98% | 0.26% |
Characteristics
FTGC | BCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | abrdn |
| Benchmark | - | Bloomberg Commodity Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Commodities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 23, 2013 | March 30, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FTGC
Data will be available soon
BCI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
FTGC
Data will be available soon
BCI
Data will be available soon
Diversification
FTGC
Data will be available soon
BCI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
FTGC
Data will be available soon
BCI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about FTGC and BCI
How have the FTGC and BCI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, FTGC is up 33.59% year-to-date (YTD), while BCI has returned 32.38%. That puts FTGC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FTGC or BCI?
Year-to-date, the FTGC ETF saw +$942M in flows, compared to +$1.02B for BCI.
Which ETF is more volatile: FTGC or BCI?
Over the past year, FTGC had a volatility of 15.58%, while BCI experienced 17.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: FTGC or BCI?
As of October 29, 2026, FTGC holds $3.37 B in assets under management (AUM), while BCI manages $3.47 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
