FTDSvsIWSETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is part of the US Mid Cap Value segment. FTDS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, IWS's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. FTDS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.88%, versus 0.23% for IWS. FTDS is up 19.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. IWS performs better with 24.21% YTD performance, and -$2.23B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTDS and IWS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FTDS vs IWS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTDS IWS | +6.08%+5.86% | +2.33%+1.68% | +19.05%+24.21% | +24.29%+28.42% | +67.23%+76.29% | +42.29%+55.67% |
| Flows | FTDS IWS | -$49K-$838M | -$49K-$946M | +$6M-$2.23B | +$9M-$1.95B | +$9M-$3.61B | +$9M-$4.68B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTDS IWS | +11.63%+10.66% | +12.24%+13.07% | +14.97%+15.09% | +17.79%+17.23% |
| Max drawdown | FTDS IWS | -7.36%-6.99% | -7.36%-7.51% | -17.92%-20.45% | -23.56%-21.32% |
| Max drawdown duration | FTDS IWS | 59d79d | 59d44d | 239d269d | 854d785d |
Trading data
FTDS | IWS | |
Last sale 11/6/2026 at 2:30 PM | $65.52 | $168.53 |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $66.21 | $168.69 |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FTDS | IWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/6/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
FTDS | IWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.52 | $168.53 |
| 1D performance | -1.04% | -0.09% |
| AuM | $39.73 M | $15.19 B |
| E/R | 0.88% | 0.23% |
Characteristics
FTDS | IWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | iShares |
| Benchmark | The Dividend Strength Index | Russell Midcap Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 710 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 5, 2006 | July 17, 2001 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FTDS
USA
93.29%
Other
6.71%
IWS
USA
95.33%
Other
4.67%
Sectors
FTDS
Finance
28.46%
Energy
21.45%
Industrials
14.91%
Technology
11.26%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.12%
Other
13.8%
IWS
Finance
25.08%
Industrials
13.04%
Healthcare
11.82%
Technology
11.32%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.79%
Other
30.94%
Advertisement
Diversification
FTDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.36%
IWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.46%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
FTDS
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.
2.76%
Phillips 66
2.60%
HF Sinclair Corp.
2.59%
APA Corp.
2.50%
Garmin Ltd.
2.30%
Allegion Plc
2.29%
Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
2.23%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
2.19%
Devon Energy Corp.
2.19%
Avery Dennison Corp.
2.18%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
2.16%
Tractor Supply Co.
2.11%
The Toro Co.
2.11%
Elevance Health, Inc.
2.08%
CDW Corp.
2.07%
IWS
Phillips 66
0.97%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.86%
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
0.75%
Moderna, Inc.
0.71%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
0.66%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
0.59%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
0.58%
AMETEK, Inc.
0.57%
The Allstate Corp.
0.57%
Baker Hughes Co.
0.55%
US30609A1097
0.54%
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.53%
Corteva, Inc.
0.53%
Devon Energy Corp.
0.53%
Nucor Corp.
0.52%
Frequently asked questions about FTDS and IWS
How have the FTDS and IWS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 5, 2026, FTDS is up 19.05% year-to-date (YTD), while IWS has returned 24.21%. That puts IWS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FTDS or IWS?
Year-to-date, the FTDS ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to -$2.23B for IWS.
Which ETF is more volatile: FTDS or IWS?
Over the past year, FTDS had a volatility of 12.24%, while IWS experienced 13.07%.
Which ETF is bigger: FTDS or IWS?
As of November 5, 2026, FTDS holds $39.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWS manages $15.19 B.
What sectors do the FTDS and IWS ETFs invest in?
FTDS leans toward sectors like Finance, Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWS focuses on Finance, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FTDS ETF and IWS ETF?
FTDS top holdings include Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., Phillips 66 and HF Sinclair Corp.. IWS holds in its top three: Phillips 66, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FTDS or IWS?
FTDS holds 50 securities with 34.36% of its assets in the top 15. IWS has 719 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.46%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
