FTCSvsRWLETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) is part of the US Large Cap segment. FTCS's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Finance. In contrast, RWL's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. FTCS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.52%, versus 0.39% for RWL. FTCS is up 6.59% year-to-date (YTD) with +$751M in YTD flows. RWL performs better with 14.57% YTD performance, and +$1.15B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTCS and RWL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FTCS vs RWL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTCS RWL | +3.77%+2.66% | +4.53%+7.32% | +6.59%+14.57% | +9.75%+26.89% | +34.70%+69.43% | +35.55%+95.10% |
| Flows | FTCS RWL | +$1.27B-$542M | +$1.00B+$262M | +$751M+$1.15B | +$306M+$1.98B | -$1.71B+$4.98B | -$2.86B+$5.80B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTCS RWL | +11.12%+8.38% | +10.18%+9.95% | +11.34%+12.35% | +13.39%+14.54% |
| Max drawdown | FTCS RWL | -3.17%-1.71% | -7.71%-6.70% | -12.52%-14.07% | -21.16%-17.55% |
| Max drawdown duration | FTCS RWL | 72d16d | 136d46d | 254d127d | 777d468d |
Trading data
FTCS | RWL | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $96.94 | $130.33 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $97.96 | $130.94 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FTCS | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FTCS | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $96.94 | $130.33 |
| 1D performance | -1.04% | -0.47% |
| AuM | $9.26 B | $9.52 B |
| E/R | 0.52% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
FTCS | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Invesco |
| Benchmark | The Capital Strength Index | S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 498 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 6, 2006 | February 22, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FTCS
USA
95.72%
Other
4.28%
RWL
USA
97.44%
Other
2.56%
Sectors
FTCS
Healthcare
18.21%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
18.08%
Finance
18.07%
Industrials
15.47%
Technology
13.82%
Other
16.35%
RWL
Technology
18.36%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
17.56%
Healthcare
17.14%
Finance
15.79%
Industrials
8.37%
Other
22.78%
Advertisement
Diversification
FTCS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.82%
RWL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.81%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
FTCS
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.87%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
2.38%
Monster Beverage Corp.
2.37%
Apple, Inc.
2.31%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
2.28%
Paychex, Inc.
2.27%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.25%
Microsoft Corp.
2.22%
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
2.19%
EOG Resources, Inc.
2.17%
Union Pacific Corp.
2.14%
The Coca-Cola Co.
2.12%
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
2.10%
Visa, Inc.
2.08%
Honeywell International, Inc.
2.07%
RWL
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.54%
Walmart, Inc.
3.38%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
2.95%
Apple, Inc.
2.57%
CVS Health Corp.
2.43%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.77%
McKesson Corp.
1.59%
Microsoft Corp.
1.58%
Centene Corp.
1.57%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
1.54%
The Cigna Group
1.47%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.42%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.41%
Elevance Health, Inc.
1.33%
Ford Motor Co.
1.27%
Frequently asked questions about FTCS and RWL
How have the FTCS and RWL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 16, 2026, FTCS is up 6.59% year-to-date (YTD), while RWL has returned 14.57%. That puts RWL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FTCS or RWL?
Year-to-date, the FTCS ETF saw +$751M in flows, compared to +$1.15B for RWL.
Which ETF is more volatile: FTCS or RWL?
Over the past year, FTCS had a volatility of 10.18%, while RWL experienced 9.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: FTCS or RWL?
As of July 16, 2026, FTCS holds $9.26 B in assets under management (AUM), while RWL manages $9.52 B.
What sectors do the FTCS and RWL ETFs invest in?
FTCS leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Finance. Meanwhile, RWL focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FTCS ETF and RWL ETF?
FTCS top holdings include Cisco Systems, Inc., Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corp.. RWL holds in its top three: Amazon.com, Inc., Walmart, Inc. and UnitedHealth Group, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FTCS or RWL?
FTCS holds 50 securities with 33.82% of its assets in the top 15. RWL has 501 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.81%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
