FSGSvsSMCOETF Comparison
VS
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) and Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF (SMCO) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. FSGS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, SMCO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Finance and Technology. FSGS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.61%, versus 0.55% for SMCO. FSGS is up 6.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. SMCO performs better with 10.5% YTD performance, and -$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSGS and SMCO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FSGS vs SMCO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSGS SMCO | +2.86%-4.48% | +6.13%-0.23% | +6.94%+10.50% | +5.98%+13.15% | +20.14%n/a | +22.34%n/a |
| Flows | FSGS SMCO | +$2M+$4M | +$51K+$13M | +$2M-$5M | -$1M+$11M | -$2M- | +$15M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSGS SMCO | +12.77%+13.68% | +14.99%+15.94% | +18.70%n/a | +19.98%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FSGS SMCO | -3.27%-5.54% | -11.35%-9.52% | -23.71%n/a | -23.71%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FSGS SMCO | 21d30d | 160d67d | 585dn/a | 585dn/a |
Trading data
FSGS | SMCO | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.55 | $29.63 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $32.53 | $29.59 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SMCO
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFSGS | SMCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FSGS | SMCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.55 | $29.63 |
| 1D performance | +0.07% | +0.15% |
| AuM | $30.91 M | $141.95 M |
| E/R | 0.61% | 0.55% |
Characteristics
FSGS | SMCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | Hilton Capital Management |
| Benchmark | The SMID Growth Strength Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 100 | 62 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 20, 2017 | November 28, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FSGS
USA
97.07%
Other
2.93%
SMCO
USA
93.23%
Other
6.77%
Sectors
FSGS
Finance
21.73%
Industrials
18%
Healthcare
17.87%
Technology
14.24%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.13%
Other
21.03%
SMCO
Industrials
20.46%
Finance
16.56%
Technology
15.9%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.2%
Healthcare
7.26%
Other
29.62%
Advertisement
Diversification
FSGS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.05%
SMCO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.66%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
FSGS
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
1.66%
Progyny, Inc.
1.57%
MYR Group, Inc.
1.39%
IES Holdings, Inc.
1.29%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.24%
Blue Bird Corp.
1.24%
Barrett Business Services, Inc.
1.24%
Duolingo, Inc.
1.19%
Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.18%
Exelixis, Inc.
1.18%
QuinStreet, Inc.
1.18%
Assurant, Inc.
1.18%
Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc.
1.18%
ACI Worldwide, Inc.
1.17%
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
1.16%
SMCO
Dycom Industries, Inc.
3.10%
MKS, Inc.
2.90%
nVent Electric Plc
2.60%
Clean Harbors, Inc.
2.56%
Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
2.55%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
2.50%
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
2.36%
IDACORP, Inc.
2.31%
Teledyne Technologies, Inc.
2.25%
Primo Brands Corp.
2.19%
HealthEquity, Inc.
2.15%
YETI Holdings, Inc.
2.11%
Ciena Corp.
2.10%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
2.00%
EQT Corp.
1.98%
Frequently asked questions about FSGS and SMCO
How have the FSGS and SMCO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, FSGS is up 6.94% year-to-date (YTD), while SMCO has returned 10.5%. That puts SMCO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSGS or SMCO?
Year-to-date, the FSGS ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to -$5M for SMCO.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSGS or SMCO?
Over the past year, FSGS had a volatility of 14.99%, while SMCO experienced 15.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSGS or SMCO?
As of July 30, 2026, FSGS holds $30.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMCO manages $141.95 M.
What sectors do the FSGS and SMCO ETFs invest in?
FSGS leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, SMCO focuses on Industrials, Finance and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FSGS ETF and SMCO ETF?
FSGS top holdings include Sterling Infrastructure, Inc., Progyny, Inc. and MYR Group, Inc.. SMCO holds in its top three: Dycom Industries, Inc., MKS, Inc. and nVent Electric Plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: FSGS or SMCO?
FSGS holds 100 securities with 19.05% of its assets in the top 15. SMCO has 62 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.66%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
