FSGSvsRSMCETF Comparison
VS
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) and Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. FSGS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.61%, versus 0.75% for RSMC. FSGS is up 0.72% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. RSMC performs better with 6.44% YTD performance, and -$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSGS and RSMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FSGS vs RSMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSGS RSMC | +7.77%+11.15% | -2.52%+2.64% | +0.72%+6.44% | +12.22%+13.13% | +23.77%n/a | +13.88%n/a |
| Flows | FSGS RSMC | --$315K | +$2M-$6M | +$2M-$13M | -$2M-$45M | -$4M- | +$18M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSGS RSMC | +17.57%+19.10% | +15.63%+17.01% | +19.23%n/a | +20.26%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FSGS RSMC | -9.55%-9.30% | -11.35%-10.66% | -23.71%n/a | -23.71%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FSGS RSMC | 90d64d | 96d84d | 519dn/a | 519dn/a |
Trading data
FSGS | RSMC | |
Last sale 4/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.66 | $27.46 |
| Previous close 04/29/2026 | $30.37 | $26.94 |
| Consolidated volume 04/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 28, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RSMC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFSGS | RSMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FSGS | RSMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.66 | $27.46 |
| 1D performance | +0.95% | +1.94% |
| AuM | $29.12 M | $739.35 M |
| E/R | 0.61% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
FSGS | RSMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | Rockefeller Asset Management |
| Benchmark | The SMID Growth Strength Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 99 | 43 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 20, 2017 | October 10, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FSGS
USA
93.61%
Other
6.39%
RSMC
USA
96.8%
Other
3.2%
Sectors
FSGS
Industrials
21.23%
Information Techn.
18.79%
Financials
17.87%
Health Care
16.19%
Consumer Discreti.
13.18%
Other
12.74%
RSMC
Industrials
27.97%
Information Techn.
19.92%
Financials
16.53%
Consumer Discreti.
8.87%
Other
26.71%
Advertisement
Diversification
FSGS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.8%
RSMC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
FSGS
MICHAEL STORES
1.49%
CLEAR SECURE
1.49%
COCA COLA CONSOLIDATED
1.45%
STRIDE INC
1.38%
COMFORT SYSTEMS USA
1.37%
LEMAITRE VASCULAR
1.33%
ATI INC
1.31%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
1.30%
NEW YORK TIMES
1.29%
CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS
1.28%
LANTHEUS HOLDINGS
1.26%
WOODWARD
1.23%
TRADEWEB MARKETS
1.21%
WEATHERFORD INTL PLC
1.21%
ENSIGN GROUP
1.20%
RSMC
FIRSTCASH HOLDINGS INC
4.90%
STONEX GROUP INC
4.48%
HNN ARMSTRNG S/D
3.92%
BJS WHOLESALE CLUB HOLDINGS INC
3.91%
BADGER METER
3.54%
RADNET
3.28%
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES
2.90%
US9037311076
2.88%
STRIDE INC
2.70%
INTERDIGITAL
2.65%
CASELLA WASTE
2.61%
TD SYNNEX
2.58%
NORDSON
2.38%
OLLIE'S BARGAI/D
2.36%
RBC BEARINGS
2.34%
Frequently asked questions about FSGS and RSMC
How have the FSGS and RSMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 28, 2026, FSGS is up 0.72% year-to-date (YTD), while RSMC has returned 6.44%. That puts RSMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSGS or RSMC?
Year-to-date, the FSGS ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to -$13M for RSMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSGS or RSMC?
Over the past year, FSGS had a volatility of 15.63%, while RSMC experienced 17.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSGS or RSMC?
As of April 28, 2026, FSGS holds $29.12 M in assets under management (AUM), while RSMC manages $739.35 M.
What sectors do the FSGS and RSMC ETFs invest in?
FSGS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, RSMC focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the FSGS ETF and RSMC ETF?
FSGS top holdings include MICHAEL STORES, CLEAR SECURE and COCA COLA CONSOLIDATED. RSMC holds in its top three: FIRSTCASH HOLDINGS INC, STONEX GROUP INC and HNN ARMSTRNG S/D.
Which ETF is more diversified: FSGS or RSMC?
FSGS holds 99 securities with 19.8% of its assets in the top 15. RSMC has 44 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.43%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
