FSGSvsOASCETF Comparison
VS
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF (OASC) is part of the US Small Cap segment. FSGS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, OASC's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. FSGS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 1.38% for OASC. FSGS is up 8.41% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. OASC performs better with 14.9% YTD performance, and +$16M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSGS and OASC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FSGS vs OASC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/14/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSGS OASC | -3.17%-5.06% | +5.29%-3.82% | +8.41%+14.90% | +5.15%+20.17% | +29.81%n/a | +27.60%n/a |
| Flows | FSGS OASC | -+$5M | +$2M+$10M | +$2M+$16M | +$107K+$38M | -$3M- | +$11M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSGS OASC | +13.49%+14.49% | +14.75%+17.17% | +18.71%n/a | +19.94%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FSGS OASC | -4.62%-6.93% | -11.35%-7.69% | -23.71%n/a | -23.71%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FSGS OASC | 32d77d | 160d40d | 585dn/a | 585dn/a |
Trading data
FSGS | OASC | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.55 | $33.74 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $32.64 | $33.80 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OASC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFSGS | OASC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FSGS | OASC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.55 | $33.74 |
| 1D performance | -0.29% | -0.18% |
| AuM | $31.33 M | $93.74 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 1.38% |
Characteristics
FSGS | OASC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | OneAscent Investments |
| Benchmark | The SMID Growth Strength Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 99 | 169 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 20, 2017 | June 13, 2024 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FSGS
USA
96.74%
Other
3.26%
OASC
USA
94.98%
Other
5.02%
Sectors
FSGS
Finance
29.35%
Healthcare
19.13%
Technology
15.82%
Industrials
12.85%
Other
22.85%
OASC
Finance
28.51%
Technology
19.77%
Healthcare
12.53%
Industrials
7.51%
Other
31.67%
Diversification
FSGS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.21%
OASC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.03%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FSGS
Elastic NV
1.33%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
1.30%
InterDigital, Inc.
1.25%
UiPath, Inc.
1.25%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
1.23%
Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
1.23%
Veeva Systems, Inc.
1.22%
Tidewater, Inc.
1.21%
Cactus, Inc.
1.20%
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
1.18%
Oceaneering International, Inc.
1.18%
PTC, Inc.
1.17%
AppFolio, Inc.
1.16%
Paylocity Holding Corp.
1.15%
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
1.15%
OASC
New Jersey Resources Corp.
2.13%
CNA Financial Corp.
2.04%
Sandisk Corp.
2.00%
Cincinnati Financial Corp.
1.72%
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
1.71%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
1.70%
Royalty Pharma Plc
1.64%
Crown Holdings, Inc.
1.61%
HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
1.57%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.57%
Ralph Lauren Corp.
1.56%
Synchrony Financial
1.53%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
1.51%
Gladstone Investment Corp.
1.41%
HF Sinclair Corp.
1.32%
Frequently asked questions about FSGS and OASC
How have the FSGS and OASC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 14, 2026, FSGS is up 8.41% year-to-date (YTD), while OASC has returned 14.9%. That puts OASC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSGS or OASC?
Year-to-date, the FSGS ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$16M for OASC.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSGS or OASC?
Over the past year, FSGS had a volatility of 14.75%, while OASC experienced 17.17%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSGS or OASC?
As of September 14, 2026, FSGS holds $31.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while OASC manages $93.74 M.
What sectors do the FSGS and OASC ETFs invest in?
FSGS leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, OASC focuses on Finance, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FSGS ETF and OASC ETF?
FSGS top holdings include Elastic NV, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and InterDigital, Inc.. OASC holds in its top three: New Jersey Resources Corp., CNA Financial Corp. and Sandisk Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FSGS or OASC?
FSGS holds 99 securities with 18.21% of its assets in the top 15. OASC has 169 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.03%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
