Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FSGSvsISCGETF Comparison
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) is part of the US Small Cap Growth segment. FSGS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, ISCG's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. FSGS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.61%, versus 0.06% for ISCG. FSGS is down -3.85% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. ISCG performs better with -1.09% YTD performance, and +$67M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSGS and ISCG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FSGS vs ISCG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSGS ISCG | -2.75%-6.00% | -5.80%-1.93% | -3.85%-1.09% | +8.38%+24.32% | +19.37%+51.36% | +7.54%+7.48% |
| Flows | FSGS ISCG | -+$15M | -$1M+$67M | +$2M+$67M | -$2M+$122M | -$3M+$262M | +$17M-$19M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSGS ISCG | +14.89%+17.95% | +19.81%+22.95% | +19.28%+20.16% | +20.34%+23.07% |
| Max drawdown | FSGS ISCG | -8.79%-8.25% | -12.54%-16.30% | -23.71%-26.39% | -23.71%-37.91% |
| Max drawdown duration | FSGS ISCG | 49d50d | 38d46d | 472d275d | 472d1096d |
FSGS | ISCG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.30 | $54.96 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $29.24 | $55.07 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FSGS | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FSGS | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.30 | $54.96 |
| 1D performance | +0.19% | -0.20% |
| AuM | $27.80 M | $862.22 M |
| E/R | 0.61% | 0.06% |
FSGS | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | iShares |
| Benchmark | The SMID Growth Strength Index | Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index |
| N° of holdings | 99 | 832 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 20, 2017 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FSGS and ISCG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, FSGS is down -3.85% year-to-date (YTD), while ISCG has lost -1.09%. That puts ISCG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSGS or ISCG?
Year-to-date, the FSGS ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$67M for ISCG.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSGS or ISCG?
Over the past year, FSGS had a volatility of 19.81%, while ISCG experienced 22.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSGS or ISCG?
As of March 12, 2026, FSGS holds $27.80 M in assets under management (AUM), while ISCG manages $862.22 M.
What sectors do the FSGS and ISCG ETFs invest in?
FSGS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, ISCG focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the FSGS ETF and ISCG ETF?
FSGS top holdings include STRIDE INC, DECKERS OUTDOOR and CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS. ISCG holds in its top three: LUMENTUM HOLDINGS, KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS and ATI INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: FSGS or ISCG?
FSGS holds 99 securities with 16.56% of its assets in the top 15. ISCG has 969 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.95%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
