Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FSGSvsFNYETF Comparison
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund ETF (FNY) is part of the US Mid Cap Growth segment. FSGS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, FNY's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. FSGS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.61%, versus 0.73% for FNY. FSGS is down -3.85% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. FNY performs better with -0.47% YTD performance, and +$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSGS and FNY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FSGS vs FNY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSGS FNY | -2.75%-4.55% | -5.80%-2.53% | -3.85%-0.47% | +8.38%+23.12% | +19.37%+60.65% | +7.54%+32.13% |
| Flows | FSGS FNY | --$5M | -$1M+$15M | +$2M+$15M | -$2M+$18M | -$3M+$91M | +$17M-$99M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSGS FNY | +14.89%+19.88% | +19.81%+23.49% | +19.28%+20.24% | +20.34%+22.44% |
| Max drawdown | FSGS FNY | -8.79%-8.32% | -12.54%-14.88% | -23.71%-24.97% | -23.71%-33.90% |
| Max drawdown duration | FSGS FNY | 49d49d | 38d46d | 472d275d | 472d1045d |
FSGS | FNY | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.30 | $90.36 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $29.24 | $90.70 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FSGS | FNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FSGS | FNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.30 | $90.36 |
| 1D performance | +0.19% | -0.37% |
| AuM | $27.80 M | $471.61 M |
| E/R | 0.61% | 0.73% |
FSGS | FNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | First Trust |
| Benchmark | The SMID Growth Strength Index | NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 99 | 206 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 20, 2017 | April 19, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FSGS and FNY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, FSGS is down -3.85% year-to-date (YTD), while FNY has lost -0.47%. That puts FNY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSGS or FNY?
Year-to-date, the FSGS ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$15M for FNY.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSGS or FNY?
Over the past year, FSGS had a volatility of 19.81%, while FNY experienced 23.49%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSGS or FNY?
As of March 12, 2026, FSGS holds $27.80 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNY manages $471.61 M.
What sectors do the FSGS and FNY ETFs invest in?
FSGS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, FNY focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FSGS ETF and FNY ETF?
FSGS top holdings include STRIDE INC, DECKERS OUTDOOR and CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS. FNY holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, AST SPACEMOBILE and TTM TECHNOLOGIES.
Which ETF is more diversified: FSGS or FNY?
FSGS holds 99 securities with 16.56% of its assets in the top 15. FNY has 224 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.29%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
