FSGSvsFFSMETF Comparison
VS
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. FSGS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, FFSM's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. FSGS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.43% for FFSM. FSGS is up 7.36% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. FFSM performs better with 13.46% YTD performance, and +$459M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSGS and FFSM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FSGS vs FFSM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSGS FFSM | -3.59%-9.57% | +4.27%-6.44% | +7.36%+13.46% | +4.13%+20.10% | +29.52%+64.18% | +24.90%+51.99% |
| Flows | FSGS FFSM | -+$51M | +$2M+$278M | +$2M+$459M | +$107K+$612M | -$3M+$1.29B | +$11M+$1.30B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSGS FFSM | +13.54%+15.33% | +14.75%+18.62% | +18.72%+19.32% | +19.94%+20.65% |
| Max drawdown | FSGS FFSM | -4.62%-9.57% | -11.35%-10.43% | -23.71%-24.54% | -23.71%-26.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | FSGS FFSM | 33d30d | 160d43d | 585d283d | 585d828d |
Trading data
FSGS | FFSM | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.55 | $34.86 |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $32.55 | $34.67 |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FFSM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFSGS | FFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FSGS | FFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.55 | $34.86 |
| 1D performance | +0.02% | +0.55% |
| AuM | $31.03 M | $1.52 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.43% |
Characteristics
FSGS | FFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | The SMID Growth Strength Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 99 | 927 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 20, 2017 | February 4, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FSGS
USA
96.74%
Other
3.26%
FFSM
USA
93.11%
Other
6.89%
Sectors
FSGS
Finance
29.35%
Healthcare
19.13%
Technology
15.82%
Industrials
12.85%
Other
22.85%
FFSM
Finance
19.84%
Industrials
17.09%
Technology
15.58%
Healthcare
11.46%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.08%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.04%
Other
16.91%
Advertisement
Diversification
FSGS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.21%
FFSM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.44%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FSGS
Elastic NV
1.33%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
1.30%
UiPath, Inc.
1.25%
InterDigital, Inc.
1.25%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
1.23%
Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
1.23%
Veeva Systems, Inc.
1.22%
Tidewater, Inc.
1.21%
Cactus, Inc.
1.20%
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
1.18%
Oceaneering International, Inc.
1.18%
PTC, Inc.
1.17%
AppFolio, Inc.
1.16%
Doximity, Inc.
1.15%
Hamilton Lane, Inc.
1.15%
FFSM
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
1.62%
Western Digital Corp.
1.60%
ATI, Inc.
1.54%
Fabrinet
1.51%
Murphy USA, Inc.
1.47%
IES Holdings, Inc.
1.46%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
1.45%
Stifel Financial Corp.
1.37%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
1.31%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
1.27%
Coherent Corp.
1.26%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
1.17%
Element Solutions, Inc.
1.14%
Genpact Ltd.
1.14%
RBC Bearings, Inc.
1.13%
Frequently asked questions about FSGS and FFSM
How have the FSGS and FFSM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, FSGS is up 7.36% year-to-date (YTD), while FFSM has returned 13.46%. That puts FFSM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSGS or FFSM?
Year-to-date, the FSGS ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$459M for FFSM.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSGS or FFSM?
Over the past year, FSGS had a volatility of 14.75%, while FFSM experienced 18.62%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSGS or FFSM?
As of September 15, 2026, FSGS holds $31.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while FFSM manages $1.52 B.
What sectors do the FSGS and FFSM ETFs invest in?
FSGS leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, FFSM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FSGS ETF and FFSM ETF?
FSGS top holdings include Elastic NV, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and UiPath, Inc.. FFSM holds in its top three: FirstCash Holdings, Inc., Western Digital Corp. and ATI, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FSGS or FFSM?
FSGS holds 99 securities with 18.21% of its assets in the top 15. FFSM has 929 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.44%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
