Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FSGSvsCSMDETF Comparison
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) and Congress SMid Growth ETF (CSMD) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. FSGS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, CSMD's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. FSGS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.61%, versus 0.9% for CSMD. FSGS is down -3.85% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. CSMD performs better with -0.8% YTD performance, and +$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSGS and CSMD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FSGS vs CSMD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSGS CSMD | -2.75%-7.01% | -5.80%-1.88% | -3.85%-0.80% | +8.38%+16.13% | +19.37%n/a | +7.54%n/a |
| Flows | FSGS CSMD | --$20M | -$1M+$20M | +$2M+$7M | -$2M+$128M | -$3M- | +$17M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSGS CSMD | +14.89%+18.73% | +19.81%+22.08% | +19.28%n/a | +20.34%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FSGS CSMD | -8.79%-9.98% | -12.54%-13.31% | -23.71%n/a | -23.71%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FSGS CSMD | 49d50d | 38d38d | 472dn/a | 472dn/a |
FSGS | CSMD | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.30 | $31.33 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $29.24 | $31.53 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FSGS | CSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FSGS | CSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.30 | $31.33 |
| 1D performance | +0.19% | -0.62% |
| AuM | $27.80 M | $410.19 M |
| E/R | 0.61% | 0.9% |
FSGS | CSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | Congress Asset Management |
| Benchmark | The SMID Growth Strength Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 99 | 41 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 20, 2017 | August 22, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FSGS and CSMD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, FSGS is down -3.85% year-to-date (YTD), while CSMD has lost -0.8%. That puts CSMD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSGS or CSMD?
Year-to-date, the FSGS ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$7M for CSMD.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSGS or CSMD?
Over the past year, FSGS had a volatility of 19.81%, while CSMD experienced 22.08%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSGS or CSMD?
As of March 12, 2026, FSGS holds $27.80 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSMD manages $410.19 M.
What sectors do the FSGS and CSMD ETFs invest in?
FSGS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, CSMD focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FSGS ETF and CSMD ETF?
FSGS top holdings include STRIDE INC, DECKERS OUTDOOR and CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS. CSMD holds in its top three: CURTISS WRIGHT, STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC and COMFORT SYSTEMS USA.
Which ETF is more diversified: FSGS or CSMD?
FSGS holds 99 securities with 16.56% of its assets in the top 15. CSMD has 42 securities and a top 15 weight of 51.02%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
