FSGSvsBFORETF Comparison
VS
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) and BARRON’S 400 ETF (BFOR) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. FSGS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, BFOR's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. FSGS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.65% for BFOR. FSGS is up 8.41% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. BFOR performs better with 13.38% YTD performance, and +$20M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSGS and BFOR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FSGS vs BFOR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/14/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSGS BFOR | -3.17%-4.93% | +5.29%+0.21% | +8.41%+13.38% | +5.15%+15.73% | +29.81%+66.93% | +27.60%+63.31% |
| Flows | FSGS BFOR | -+$14M | +$2M+$9M | +$2M+$20M | +$107K+$22M | -$3M+$21M | +$11M+$14M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSGS BFOR | +13.49%+11.16% | +14.75%+14.34% | +18.71%+17.03% | +19.94%+19.44% |
| Max drawdown | FSGS BFOR | -4.62%-5.32% | -11.35%-8.35% | -23.71%-21.70% | -23.71%-26.04% |
| Max drawdown duration | FSGS BFOR | 32d30d | 160d49d | 585d219d | 585d815d |
Trading data
FSGS | BFOR | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.55 | $23.26 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $32.64 | $23.32 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FSGS | BFOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FSGS | BFOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.55 | $23.26 |
| 1D performance | -0.29% | -0.26% |
| AuM | $31.33 M | $232.72 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
FSGS | BFOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | ALPS |
| Benchmark | The SMID Growth Strength Index | Barron's 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | 99 | 396 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 20, 2017 | June 3, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FSGS
USA
96.74%
Other
3.26%
BFOR
USA
95.35%
Other
4.65%
Sectors
FSGS
Finance
29.35%
Healthcare
19.13%
Technology
15.82%
Industrials
12.85%
Other
22.85%
BFOR
Finance
24.18%
Technology
17.28%
Industrials
13.25%
Healthcare
12.09%
Other
33.19%
Advertisement
Diversification
FSGS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.21%
BFOR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.7%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FSGS
Elastic NV
1.33%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
1.30%
InterDigital, Inc.
1.25%
UiPath, Inc.
1.25%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
1.23%
Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
1.23%
Veeva Systems, Inc.
1.22%
Tidewater, Inc.
1.21%
Cactus, Inc.
1.20%
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
1.18%
Oceaneering International, Inc.
1.18%
PTC, Inc.
1.17%
AppFolio, Inc.
1.16%
Paylocity Holding Corp.
1.15%
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
1.15%
BFOR
Dell Technologies, Inc.
0.59%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.55%
Sezzle, Inc.
0.52%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
0.49%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.47%
Western Digital Corp.
0.44%
Fortinet, Inc.
0.43%
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.43%
Enova International, Inc.
0.42%
Iridium Communications, Inc.
0.42%
Sandisk Corp.
0.41%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.
0.39%
NVE Corp.
0.38%
Illumina, Inc.
0.38%
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
0.38%
Frequently asked questions about FSGS and BFOR
How have the FSGS and BFOR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 14, 2026, FSGS is up 8.41% year-to-date (YTD), while BFOR has returned 13.38%. That puts BFOR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSGS or BFOR?
Year-to-date, the FSGS ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$20M for BFOR.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSGS or BFOR?
Over the past year, FSGS had a volatility of 14.75%, while BFOR experienced 14.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSGS or BFOR?
As of September 14, 2026, FSGS holds $31.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while BFOR manages $232.72 M.
What sectors do the FSGS and BFOR ETFs invest in?
FSGS leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, BFOR focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FSGS ETF and BFOR ETF?
FSGS top holdings include Elastic NV, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and InterDigital, Inc.. BFOR holds in its top three: Dell Technologies, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Sezzle, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FSGS or BFOR?
FSGS holds 99 securities with 18.21% of its assets in the top 15. BFOR has 396 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.7%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
