Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FSCSvsSDVYETF Comparison
First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF (FSCS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) is part of the US High Dividend segment. FSCS's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, SDVY's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. FSCS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.59% for SDVY. FSCS is down -0.59% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. SDVY performs better with 2.88% YTD performance, and +$321M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSCS and SDVY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FSCS vs SDVY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSCS SDVY | -4.39%-5.73% | -1.88%+0.57% | -0.59%+2.88% | +5.58%+21.06% | +38.98%+59.88% | +35.39%+49.01% |
| Flows | FSCS SDVY | -+$88M | +$4M+$398M | +$4M+$321M | +$32M+$820M | +$42M+$7.48B | +$38M+$8.63B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSCS SDVY | +11.41%+15.11% | +17.29%+20.52% | +16.30%+19.86% | +18.13%+21.14% |
| Max drawdown | FSCS SDVY | -5.74%-7.32% | -12.10%-13.94% | -19.22%-26.11% | -21.18%-26.11% |
| Max drawdown duration | FSCS SDVY | 30d18d | 36d46d | 472d406d | 393d406d |
FSCS | SDVY | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 7:59 PM | $35.49 | $39.38 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $35.87 | $39.42 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FSCS | SDVY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FSCS | SDVY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.49 | $39.38 |
| 1D performance | -1.06% | -0.11% |
| AuM | $58.64 M | $10.05 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.59% |
FSCS | SDVY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | First Trust |
| Benchmark | The SMID Capital Strength Index | Nasdaq US SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers Index |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 170 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 20, 2017 | November 1, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FSCS and SDVY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, FSCS is down -0.59% year-to-date (YTD), while SDVY has returned 2.88%. That puts SDVY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSCS or SDVY?
Year-to-date, the FSCS ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$321M for SDVY.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSCS or SDVY?
Over the past year, FSCS had a volatility of 17.29%, while SDVY experienced 20.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSCS or SDVY?
As of March 12, 2026, FSCS holds $58.64 M in assets under management (AUM), while SDVY manages $10.05 B.
What sectors do the FSCS and SDVY ETFs invest in?
FSCS leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, SDVY focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FSCS ETF and SDVY ETF?
FSCS top holdings include PATHWARD FINANCIAL INC, MAGNOLIA OIL AND GAS CORP and INTER PARFUMS. SDVY holds in its top three: COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, ENERSYS and WEATHERFORD INTL PLC.
Which ETF is more diversified: FSCS or SDVY?
FSCS holds 100 securities with 16.06% of its assets in the top 15. SDVY has 175 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.88%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
