FSCSvsOUSMETF Comparison
VS
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF (FSCS) and ALPS O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. FSCS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, OUSM's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. FSCS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.48% for OUSM. FSCS is up 3.08% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. OUSM performs better with 11.06% YTD performance, and -$157M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSCS and OUSM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FSCS vs OUSM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSCS OUSM | -4.11%-3.33% | +3.21%+4.79% | +3.08%+11.06% | +0.86%+9.13% | +33.71%+41.27% | +34.80%+48.08% |
| Flows | FSCS OUSM | +$2M-$22M | +$61K-$79M | +$2M-$157M | +$11M-$227M | +$34M+$305M | +$33M+$489M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSCS OUSM | +11.33%+12.15% | +11.97%+12.80% | +15.57%+15.11% | +17.85%+16.45% |
| Max drawdown | FSCS OUSM | -4.73%-4.58% | -7.85%-9.24% | -19.22%-19.49% | -21.18%-19.49% |
| Max drawdown duration | FSCS OUSM | 32d25d | 155d124d | 609d435d | 393d435d |
Trading data
FSCS | OUSM | |
Last sale 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.85 | |
| Previous close 09/11/2026 | $36.76 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FSCS | OUSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FSCS | OUSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.85 | – |
| 1D performance | +0.26% | – |
| AuM | $58.61 M | $824.93 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.48% |
Characteristics
FSCS | OUSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | O'Shares |
| Benchmark | The SMID Capital Strength Index | O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index |
| N° of holdings | 100 | 109 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 20, 2017 | December 30, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FSCS
USA
92.83%
Other
7.17%
OUSM
USA
97.86%
Other
2.14%
Sectors
FSCS
Finance
31.92%
Industrials
20.05%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
14.1%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.99%
Other
20.94%
OUSM
Finance
22.18%
Industrials
18.11%
Technology
11.54%
Consumer Services
9.79%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.72%
Healthcare
8.47%
Other
21.18%
Advertisement
Diversification
FSCS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.07%
OUSM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.61%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FSCS
MarketAxess Holdings, Inc.
1.39%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
1.34%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
1.17%
Allegion Plc
1.16%
Nordson Corp.
1.14%
Tetra Tech, Inc.
1.14%
Avery Dennison Corp.
1.12%
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
1.08%
MSA Safety, Inc.
1.08%
The Clorox Co.
1.08%
Exponent, Inc.
1.08%
The Hershey Co.
1.08%
Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc.
1.07%
Expand Energy Corp.
1.07%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.07%
OUSM
Chemed Corp.
2.42%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
2.34%
SEI Investments Co.
2.23%
National HealthCare Corp.
2.20%
Primerica, Inc.
2.19%
Radian Group Inc.
2.18%
MGIC Investment Corp.
2.17%
Essent Group Ltd.
2.15%
Donaldson Co., Inc.
2.11%
Royalty Pharma Plc
2.02%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.94%
The New York Times Co.
1.93%
Avnet, Inc.
1.92%
ITT, Inc.
1.91%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
1.90%
Frequently asked questions about FSCS and OUSM
How have the FSCS and OUSM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, FSCS is up 3.08% year-to-date (YTD), while OUSM has returned 11.06%. That puts OUSM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSCS or OUSM?
Year-to-date, the FSCS ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to -$157M for OUSM.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSCS or OUSM?
Over the past year, FSCS had a volatility of 11.97%, while OUSM experienced 12.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSCS or OUSM?
As of September 10, 2026, FSCS holds $58.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while OUSM manages $824.93 M.
What sectors do the FSCS and OUSM ETFs invest in?
FSCS leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, OUSM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FSCS ETF and OUSM ETF?
FSCS top holdings include MarketAxess Holdings, Inc., Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.. OUSM holds in its top three: Chemed Corp., Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and SEI Investments Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: FSCS or OUSM?
FSCS holds 100 securities with 17.07% of its assets in the top 15. OUSM has 109 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.61%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
