FSCSvsAFMCETF Comparison
VS
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF (FSCS) and First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. FSCS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, AFMC's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. FSCS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.68% for AFMC. FSCS is up 3.08% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. AFMC performs better with 17.12% YTD performance, and +$99M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSCS and AFMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FSCS vs AFMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSCS AFMC | -4.11%-3.38% | +3.21%+2.02% | +3.08%+17.12% | +0.86%+19.29% | +33.71%+67.93% | +34.80%+64.88% |
| Flows | FSCS AFMC | +$2M+$23M | +$61K+$47M | +$2M+$99M | +$11M+$111M | +$34M+$178M | +$33M+$184M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSCS AFMC | +11.33%+12.03% | +11.97%+14.82% | +15.57%+17.44% | +17.85%+19.20% |
| Max drawdown | FSCS AFMC | -4.73%-4.33% | -7.85%-8.15% | -19.22%-21.83% | -21.18%-25.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | FSCS AFMC | 32d25d | 155d47d | 609d289d | 393d752d |
Trading data
FSCS | AFMC | |
Last sale 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.85 | $40.35 |
| Previous close 09/11/2026 | $36.76 | $40.74 |
| Consolidated volume 09/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
AFMC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFSCS | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FSCS | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.85 | $40.35 |
| 1D performance | +0.26% | -0.96% |
| AuM | $58.61 M | $215.05 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.68% |
Characteristics
FSCS | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | First Trust |
| Benchmark | The SMID Capital Strength Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 100 | 261 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 20, 2017 | December 3, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FSCS
USA
92.83%
Other
7.17%
AFMC
USA
95.63%
Other
4.37%
Sectors
FSCS
Finance
31.92%
Industrials
20.05%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
14.1%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.99%
Other
20.94%
AFMC
Finance
20.72%
Technology
18%
Industrials
17.08%
Healthcare
10.33%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.61%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.56%
Other
14.7%
Advertisement
Diversification
FSCS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.07%
AFMC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.36%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FSCS
MarketAxess Holdings, Inc.
1.39%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
1.34%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
1.17%
Allegion Plc
1.16%
Nordson Corp.
1.14%
Tetra Tech, Inc.
1.14%
Avery Dennison Corp.
1.12%
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
1.08%
MSA Safety, Inc.
1.08%
The Clorox Co.
1.08%
Exponent, Inc.
1.08%
The Hershey Co.
1.08%
Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc.
1.07%
Expand Energy Corp.
1.07%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.07%
AFMC
Reliance, Inc.
1.45%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
1.30%
BorgWarner, Inc.
1.24%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
1.18%
TechnipFMC plc
1.14%
Federated Hermes, Inc.
1.13%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
1.08%
Chord Energy Corp.
1.08%
Exelixis, Inc.
1.05%
Matson, Inc.
1.05%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
0.99%
ATI, Inc.
0.97%
National Fuel Gas Co.
0.91%
APA Corp.
0.90%
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
0.89%
Frequently asked questions about FSCS and AFMC
How have the FSCS and AFMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, FSCS is up 3.08% year-to-date (YTD), while AFMC has returned 17.12%. That puts AFMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSCS or AFMC?
Year-to-date, the FSCS ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$99M for AFMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSCS or AFMC?
Over the past year, FSCS had a volatility of 11.97%, while AFMC experienced 14.82%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSCS or AFMC?
As of September 10, 2026, FSCS holds $58.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while AFMC manages $215.05 M.
What sectors do the FSCS and AFMC ETFs invest in?
FSCS leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, AFMC focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FSCS ETF and AFMC ETF?
FSCS top holdings include MarketAxess Holdings, Inc., Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.. AFMC holds in its top three: Reliance, Inc., Casey's General Stores, Inc. and BorgWarner, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FSCS or AFMC?
FSCS holds 100 securities with 17.07% of its assets in the top 15. AFMC has 261 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.36%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
