Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FSCCvsVTWOETF Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. FSCC's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, VTWO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. FSCC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.51%, versus 0.06% for VTWO. FSCC is up 0.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$85M in YTD flows. VTWO performs better with 2.66% YTD performance, and +$56M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSCC and VTWO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FSCC vs VTWO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSCC VTWO | -5.65%-4.61% | -1.54%-1.54% | +0.91%+2.66% | +29.71%+27.44% | n/a+52.33% | n/a+16.56% |
| Flows | FSCC VTWO | +$22M+$508M | +$96M+$205M | +$85M+$56M | +$143M+$616M | -+$4.84B | -+$7.21B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSCC VTWO | +17.47%+18.18% | +23.19%+23.05% | n/a+21.08% | n/a+22.67% |
| Max drawdown | FSCC VTWO | -6.47%-6.98% | -16.39%-16.46% | n/a-27.51% | n/a-31.93% |
| Max drawdown duration | FSCC VTWO | 47d48d | 46d52d | n/a289d | n/a1093d |
FSCC | VTWO | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 6:07 PM | $29.73 | $99.98 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $30.18 | $102.22 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FSCC | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FSCC | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.73 | $99.98 |
| 1D performance | -1.49% | -2.19% |
| AuM | $156.99 M | $14.22 B |
| E/R | 0.51% | 0.06% |
FSCC | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Federated Investment Management | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 2000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 272 | 1636 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2024 | September 20, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FSCC and VTWO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FSCC is up 0.91% year-to-date (YTD), while VTWO has returned 2.66%. That puts VTWO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSCC or VTWO?
Year-to-date, the FSCC ETF saw +$85M in flows, compared to +$56M for VTWO.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSCC or VTWO?
Over the past year, FSCC had a volatility of 23.19%, while VTWO experienced 23.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSCC or VTWO?
As of March 10, 2026, FSCC holds $156.99 M in assets under management (AUM), while VTWO manages $14.22 B.
What sectors do the FSCC and VTWO ETFs invest in?
FSCC leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, VTWO focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the FSCC ETF and VTWO ETF?
FSCC top holdings include PRIMORIS SERVICES, MIRUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC and JACKSON FINANCIAL INC. VTWO holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET.
Which ETF is more diversified: FSCC or VTWO?
FSCC holds 276 securities with 16.58% of its assets in the top 15. VTWO has 1958 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.4%.
Will 2024 be the Year of Small Caps and Value Stocks?
Value ETFs Shine Amid Lower-Than-Expected Inflation
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
