Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FSCCvsRYLGETF Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) is part of the Options Strategies segment. FSCC's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, RYLG's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. FSCC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.51%, versus 0.35% for RYLG. FSCC is up 0.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$85M in YTD flows. RYLG performs better with 2.38% YTD performance, and -$234K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSCC and RYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FSCC vs RYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSCC RYLG | -5.65%-3.18% | -1.54%+0.57% | +0.91%+2.38% | +29.71%+20.49% | n/a+37.36% | n/an/a |
| Flows | FSCC RYLG | +$22M- | +$96M-$234K | +$85M-$234K | +$143M+$208K | -+$5M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSCC RYLG | +17.47%+14.66% | +23.19%+19.57% | n/a+16.89% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FSCC RYLG | -6.47%-4.70% | -16.39%-15.02% | n/a-22.43% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FSCC RYLG | 47d13d | 46d74d | n/a296d | n/an/a |
FSCC | RYLG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.58 | $21.92 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $30.18 | $22.38 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FSCC | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FSCC | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.58 | $21.92 |
| 1D performance | -1.99% | -2.06% |
| AuM | $156.99 M | $7.84 M |
| E/R | 0.51% | 0.35% |
FSCC | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Federated Investment Management | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 272 | 1631 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2024 | October 4, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FSCC and RYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FSCC is up 0.91% year-to-date (YTD), while RYLG has returned 2.38%. That puts RYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSCC or RYLG?
Year-to-date, the FSCC ETF saw +$85M in flows, compared to -$234K for RYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSCC or RYLG?
Over the past year, FSCC had a volatility of 23.19%, while RYLG experienced 19.57%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSCC or RYLG?
As of March 10, 2026, FSCC holds $156.99 M in assets under management (AUM), while RYLG manages $7.84 M.
What sectors do the FSCC and RYLG ETFs invest in?
FSCC leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, RYLG focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the FSCC ETF and RYLG ETF?
FSCC top holdings include PRIMORIS SERVICES, MIRUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC and JACKSON FINANCIAL INC. RYLG holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS.
Which ETF is more diversified: FSCC or RYLG?
FSCC holds 276 securities with 16.58% of its assets in the top 15. RYLG has 1883 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.8%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
