FSCCvsIWMWETF Comparison
VS
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) is part of the Options Strategies segment. FSCC's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, IWMW's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. FSCC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.51%, versus 0.39% for IWMW. FSCC is up 15.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$329M in YTD flows. IWMW performs worse with 13.7% YTD performance, and +$24M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSCC and IWMW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FSCC vs IWMW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSCC IWMW | -3.49%-2.56% | +1.89%+4.23% | +15.39%+13.70% | +18.74%+16.20% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FSCC IWMW | +$110M-$821K | +$153M+$7M | +$329M+$24M | +$371M+$33M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSCC IWMW | +15.80%+9.84% | +18.69%+12.34% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FSCC IWMW | -7.22%-3.79% | -11.07%-6.92% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FSCC IWMW | 72d26d | 83d62d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
FSCC | IWMW | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.83 | $38.48 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $34.62 | $38.52 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FSCC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFSCC | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FSCC | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.83 | $38.48 |
| 1D performance | +0.61% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $424.42 M | $58.07 M |
| E/R | 0.51% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
FSCC | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Federated Investment Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Cboe FTSE Russell IWM 2% OTM BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 307 | 1945 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2024 | March 14, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FSCC
USA
92.09%
Other
7.91%
IWMW
USA
96.06%
Other
3.94%
Sectors
FSCC
Finance
28.36%
Healthcare
19.99%
Industrials
13.27%
Technology
12.23%
Other
26.14%
IWMW
Finance
26.88%
Healthcare
20.29%
Technology
11.87%
Industrials
10.58%
Other
30.37%
Advertisement
Diversification
FSCC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.99%
IWMW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.1%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FSCC
American Healthcare REIT, Inc.
2.16%
SPS Commerce, Inc.
1.55%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
1.35%
Postal Realty Trust, Inc.
1.25%
Liquidia Corp.
1.22%
Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd.
1.14%
Sphere Entertainment Co.
1.13%
BankUnited, Inc.
1.10%
Indivior Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.09%
CNO Financial Group, Inc.
1.08%
Byline Bancorp, Inc.
1.06%
Hecla Mining Co.
0.99%
The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Ltd.
0.97%
FB Financial Corp.
0.96%
Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.95%
IWMW
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
0.61%
Moog, Inc.
0.39%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.38%
Hut 8 Corp.
0.36%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.35%
Cytokinetics, Inc.
0.34%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.32%
Glaukos Corp.
0.31%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.31%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.30%
Old National Bancorp
0.30%
Brinker International, Inc.
0.29%
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.28%
HealthEquity, Inc.
0.28%
JFrog Ltd.
0.28%
Frequently asked questions about FSCC and IWMW
How have the FSCC and IWMW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, FSCC is up 15.39% year-to-date (YTD), while IWMW has returned 13.7%. That puts FSCC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSCC or IWMW?
Year-to-date, the FSCC ETF saw +$329M in flows, compared to +$24M for IWMW.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSCC or IWMW?
Over the past year, FSCC had a volatility of 18.69%, while IWMW experienced 12.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSCC or IWMW?
As of September 10, 2026, FSCC holds $424.42 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWMW manages $58.07 M.
What sectors do the FSCC and IWMW ETFs invest in?
FSCC leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWMW focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FSCC ETF and IWMW ETF?
FSCC top holdings include American Healthcare REIT, Inc., SPS Commerce, Inc. and BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.. IWMW holds in its top three: BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury, Moog, Inc. and BrightSpring Health Services, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FSCC or IWMW?
FSCC holds 307 securities with 17.99% of its assets in the top 15. IWMW has 1957 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.1%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
