Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FSCCvsGSSCETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. FSCC's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, GSSC's top sector exposures are Health Care, Financials and Industrials. FSCC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.51%, versus 0.2% for GSSC. FSCC is up 0.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$85M in YTD flows. GSSC performs worse with 0.51% YTD performance, and +$134M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSCC and GSSC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FSCC vs GSSC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSCC GSSC | -5.65%-5.44% | -1.54%-1.93% | +0.91%+0.51% | +29.71%+21.49% | n/a+43.51% | n/a+27.07% |
| Flows | FSCC GSSC | +$22M- | +$96M+$137M | +$85M+$134M | +$143M+$250M | -+$245M | -+$405M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSCC GSSC | +17.47%+17.08% | +23.19%+22.32% | n/a+20.63% | n/a+21.61% |
| Max drawdown | FSCC GSSC | -6.47%-7.02% | -16.39%-15.00% | n/a-25.99% | n/a-27.32% |
| Max drawdown duration | FSCC GSSC | 47d47d | 46d46d | n/a289d | n/a977d |
FSCC | GSSC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.58 | $74.24 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $30.18 | $75.71 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FSCC | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FSCC | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.58 | $74.24 |
| 1D performance | -1.99% | -1.94% |
| AuM | $156.99 M | $858.08 M |
| E/R | 0.51% | 0.2% |
FSCC | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Federated Investment Management | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 272 | 1210 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2024 | June 28, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FSCC and GSSC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FSCC is up 0.91% year-to-date (YTD), while GSSC has returned 0.51%. That puts FSCC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSCC or GSSC?
Year-to-date, the FSCC ETF saw +$85M in flows, compared to +$134M for GSSC.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSCC or GSSC?
Over the past year, FSCC had a volatility of 23.19%, while GSSC experienced 22.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSCC or GSSC?
As of March 10, 2026, FSCC holds $156.99 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSSC manages $858.08 M.
What sectors do the FSCC and GSSC ETFs invest in?
FSCC leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, GSSC focuses on Health Care, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FSCC ETF and GSSC ETF?
FSCC top holdings include PRIMORIS SERVICES, MIRUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC and JACKSON FINANCIAL INC. GSSC holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, IES HOLDINGS and COMPASS.
Which ETF is more diversified: FSCC or GSSC?
FSCC holds 276 securities with 16.58% of its assets in the top 15. GSSC has 1322 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.25%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
