Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FRTYvsQGROETF Comparison
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. FRTY's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, QGRO's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. FRTY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.98%, versus 0.29% for QGRO. FRTY is down -4.9% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. QGRO performs worse with -5.07% YTD performance, and -$44M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FRTY and QGRO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FRTY vs QGRO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FRTY QGRO | -3.57%-0.96% | -6.79%-6.33% | -4.90%-5.07% | +26.77%+17.40% | +69.63%+83.10% | +4.30%+75.58% |
| Flows | FRTY QGRO | +$293K-$16M | +$21M+$60M | +$7M-$44M | +$39M+$772M | +$85M+$1.29B | +$122M+$1.39B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FRTY QGRO | +24.00%+16.74% | +27.30%+21.67% | +23.66%+17.98% | +25.36%+21.19% |
| Max drawdown | FRTY QGRO | -11.72%-8.94% | -16.89%-15.12% | -31.82%-23.75% | -52.85%-31.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | FRTY QGRO | 64d63d | 45d37d | 262d156d | 1584d794d |
FRTY | QGRO | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $19.47 | $106.43 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $19.53 | $106.78 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FRTY | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FRTY | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $19.47 | $106.43 |
| 1D performance | -0.31% | -0.33% |
| AuM | $132.18 M | $2.09 B |
| E/R | 0.98% | 0.29% |
FRTY | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Fred Alger Management | American Century Investments |
| Benchmark | - | American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 179 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2021 | January 11, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FRTY and QGRO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FRTY is down -4.9% year-to-date (YTD), while QGRO has lost -5.07%. That puts FRTY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FRTY or QGRO?
Year-to-date, the FRTY ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to -$44M for QGRO.
Which ETF is more volatile: FRTY or QGRO?
Over the past year, FRTY had a volatility of 27.3%, while QGRO experienced 21.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: FRTY or QGRO?
As of March 11, 2026, FRTY holds $132.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while QGRO manages $2.09 B.
What sectors do the FRTY and QGRO ETFs invest in?
FRTY leans toward sectors like Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, QGRO focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the FRTY ETF and QGRO ETF?
FRTY top holdings include US5312297550, MICRON TECHNOLOGY and COMFORT SYSTEMS USA. QGRO holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, US5128073062 and AMPHENOL.
Which ETF is more diversified: FRTY or QGRO?
FRTY holds 34 securities with 47.88% of its assets in the top 15. QGRO has 190 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.99%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
