FPXvsBCUSETF Comparison
VS
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF (BCUS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. FPX's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, BCUS's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. FPX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.61%, versus 0.8% for BCUS. FPX is up 6.32% year-to-date (YTD) with +$125M in YTD flows. BCUS performs worse with -0.96% YTD performance, and +$51M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FPX and BCUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FPX vs BCUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FPX BCUS | -2.53%-5.54% | +1.13%-10.06% | +6.32%-0.96% | +2.34%-1.59% | +129.60%n/a | +35.94%n/a |
| Flows | FPX BCUS | -$27M-$325K | -$53M+$4M | +$125M+$51M | +$158M+$51M | +$96M- | -$612M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FPX BCUS | +22.60%+18.71% | +26.63%+18.07% | +26.83%n/a | +27.27%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FPX BCUS | -12.55%-14.52% | -17.90%-15.04% | -30.75%n/a | -43.15%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FPX BCUS | 73d74d | 121d130d | 125dn/a | 1183dn/a |
Trading data
FPX | BCUS | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $169.24 | $31.92 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $174.16 | $33.09 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BCUS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFPX | BCUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FPX | BCUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $169.24 | $31.92 |
| 1D performance | -2.82% | -3.56% |
| AuM | $1.39 B | $140.08 M |
| E/R | 0.61% | 0.8% |
Characteristics
FPX | BCUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | Exchange Traded Concepts |
| Benchmark | IPOX U.S. 100 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 100 | 30 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 12, 2006 | December 21, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FPX
USA
90.59%
Other
9.41%
BCUS
USA
91.65%
Other
8.36%
Sectors
FPX
Technology
27.63%
Healthcare
20.83%
Finance
14.57%
Industrials
11.01%
Telecommunication.
7.8%
Other
18.16%
BCUS
Technology
30.66%
Industrials
16.94%
Non-Energy Materi.
14.59%
Finance
11.36%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.1%
Other
17.36%
Advertisement
Diversification
FPX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.08%
BCUS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.89%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
FPX
GE Vernova, Inc.
7.76%
Sandisk Corp.
7.15%
Eli Lilly & Co.
7.10%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
6.15%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
5.64%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
3.07%
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
3.06%
HF Sinclair Corp.
3.06%
Twilio, Inc.
2.27%
Corpay, Inc.
1.96%
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
1.78%
Unity Software, Inc.
1.57%
DoorDash, Inc.
1.55%
Applovin Corp.
1.54%
Dave, Inc.
1.42%
BCUS
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
4.84%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.57%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.54%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.28%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
4.03%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
4.00%
Broadcom Inc.
3.97%
InterDigital, Inc.
3.81%
Millicom International Cellular SA
3.68%
Applovin Corp.
3.66%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
3.19%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
3.09%
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
3.08%
Amphenol Corp.
3.08%
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
3.07%
Frequently asked questions about FPX and BCUS
How have the FPX and BCUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, FPX is up 6.32% year-to-date (YTD), while BCUS has lost -0.96%. That puts FPX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FPX or BCUS?
Year-to-date, the FPX ETF saw +$125M in flows, compared to +$51M for BCUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: FPX or BCUS?
Over the past year, FPX had a volatility of 26.63%, while BCUS experienced 18.07%.
Which ETF is bigger: FPX or BCUS?
As of October 29, 2026, FPX holds $1.39 B in assets under management (AUM), while BCUS manages $140.08 M.
What sectors do the FPX and BCUS ETFs invest in?
FPX leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, BCUS focuses on Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the FPX ETF and BCUS ETF?
FPX top holdings include GE Vernova, Inc., Sandisk Corp. and Eli Lilly & Co.. BCUS holds in its top three: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings Plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: FPX or BCUS?
FPX holds 100 securities with 55.08% of its assets in the top 15. BCUS has 30 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.89%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
