BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

FPWRvsZAPETF Comparison

ETF 1

FPWR

First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF

Full FPWR fund page

VS

ETF 2

ZAP

Global X U.S. Electrification ETF

This fund is part of

Infrastructure

-0.97%

Full ZAP fund page

First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR) belongs to the segment. Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) is part of the Infrastructure segment. FPWR's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, ZAP's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. FPWR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.96%, versus 0.5% for ZAP. FPWR is up 12.65% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. ZAP performs worse with 12.48% YTD performance, and +$152M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FPWR and ZAP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

FPWR vs ZAP performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 06/10/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	FPWR ZAP	-1.19%-4.50%	-0.23%+0.29%	+12.65%+12.48%	+20.82%+27.60%	+59.39%n/a	+72.99%n/a
Flows	FPWR ZAP	-+$11M	+$4M+$79M	+$5M+$152M	+$7M+$321M	-$18M-	+$5M-

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	FPWR ZAP	+12.80%+19.37%	+10.73%+15.34%	+13.26%n/a	+14.46%n/a
Max drawdown	FPWR ZAP	-5.12%-6.27%	-5.12%-7.24%	-14.68%n/a	-18.90%n/a
Max drawdown duration	FPWR ZAP	41d41d	41d114d	288dn/a	694dn/a

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	FPWR	ZAP
Last sale 6/11/2026 at 1:30 PM	$36.92	$32.91
Previous close 06/10/2026	$36.91	$32.54
Consolidated volume 06/10/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of May 29, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

FPWR

is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	FPWR	ZAP
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 6/11/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	FPWR	ZAP
Last price	$36.92	$32.91
1D performance	+0.03%	+1.13%
AuM	$25.83 M	$431.45 M
E/R	0.96%	0.5%

Characteristics

	FPWR	ZAP
Management strategy	Active	Passive
Provider	First Trust	Global X
Benchmark	-	Global X U.S. Electrification Index
N° of holdings	52	47
Asset class	-	-
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	August 19, 2019	December 18, 2024
ESG	Yes	No

More FPWR data on Trackinsight

More ZAP data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

FPWR

USA

77.62%

Other

22.38%

ZAP

USA

94.25%

Other

5.75%

Sectors

FPWR

Utilities

64.1%

Energy

9.62%

Other

26.29%

ZAP

Utilities

67.74%

Industrials

26.29%

Other

5.97%

Diversification

FPWR

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

41.52%

ZAP

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

61.4%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of April 30, 2026

FPWR

DUKE ENERGY

3.39%

PPL

3.34%

NFG

3.34%

SOUTHERN

3.15%

WEC ENERGY GROUP INC

2.93%

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER

2.90%

IDACORP

2.76%

KINDER MORGAN

2.73%

ENTERGY

2.61%

VISTRA CORP

2.54%

XCEL ENERGY

2.50%

EVERGY

2.41%

DTE ENERGY

2.35%

CLEARWAY ENERGY INC

2.34%

PUBLIC SRVCE ENT

2.23%

ZAP

QUANTA SERVICES

5.32%

BLOOM ENERGY CORP

5.21%

AMETEK

4.51%

ENTERGY

4.40%

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER

4.21%

US6362744095

4.11%

NEXTERA ENERGY

4.09%

EATON CORP PLC

4.04%

CONSOLIDATED EDISON

3.96%

DOMINION ENERGY

3.79%

DUKE ENERGY

3.62%

EXELON CORP

3.62%

XCEL ENERGY

3.57%

SOUTHERN

3.51%

PUBLIC SRVCE ENT

3.45%

Frequently asked questions about FPWR and ZAP

How have the FPWR and ZAP ETFs performed in 2026?

As of June 10, 2026, FPWR is up 12.65% year-to-date (YTD), while ZAP has returned 12.48%. That puts FPWR better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FPWR or ZAP?

Year-to-date, the FPWR ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$152M for ZAP.

Which ETF is more volatile: FPWR or ZAP?

Over the past year, FPWR had a volatility of 10.73%, while ZAP experienced 15.34%.

Which ETF is bigger: FPWR or ZAP?

As of June 10, 2026, FPWR holds $25.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while ZAP manages $431.45 M.

What sectors do the FPWR and ZAP ETFs invest in?

FPWR leans toward sectors like Utilities and Energy. Meanwhile, ZAP focuses on Utilities and Industrials.

What are the top holdings of the FPWR ETF and ZAP ETF?

FPWR top holdings include DUKE ENERGY, PPL and NFG. ZAP holds in its top three: QUANTA SERVICES, BLOOM ENERGY CORP and AMETEK.

Which ETF is more diversified: FPWR or ZAP?

FPWR holds 52 securities with 41.52% of its assets in the top 15. ZAP has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.4%.

There's an ETF for that? Electrification

January 28, 2025

ZAP

FPWRvsZAPETF Comparison

First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF

Global X U.S. Electrification ETF

FPWR vs ZAP performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the FPWR and ZAP ETFs performed in 2026?

As of June 10, 2026, FPWR is up 12.65% year-to-date (YTD), while ZAP has returned 12.48%. That puts FPWR better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FPWR or ZAP?

Year-to-date, the FPWR ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$152M for ZAP.

Which ETF is more volatile: FPWR or ZAP?

Over the past year, FPWR had a volatility of 10.73%, while ZAP experienced 15.34%.

Which ETF is bigger: FPWR or ZAP?

As of June 10, 2026, FPWR holds $25.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while ZAP manages $431.45 M.

What sectors do the FPWR and ZAP ETFs invest in?

FPWR leans toward sectors like Utilities and Energy. Meanwhile, ZAP focuses on Utilities and Industrials.

What are the top holdings of the FPWR ETF and ZAP ETF?

FPWR top holdings include DUKE ENERGY, PPL and NFG. ZAP holds in its top three: QUANTA SERVICES, BLOOM ENERGY CORP and AMETEK.

Which ETF is more diversified: FPWR or ZAP?

FPWR holds 52 securities with 41.52% of its assets in the top 15. ZAP has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.4%.

There's an ETF for that? Electrification

The ETF Industry Is Evolving Fast