FPAGvsACWVETF Comparison
VS
FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. FPAG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. In contrast, ACWV's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. FPAG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.86%, versus 0.2% for ACWV. FPAG is up 13% year-to-date (YTD) with +$267M in YTD flows. ACWV performs worse with 7.06% YTD performance, and -$131M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FPAG and ACWV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FPAG vs ACWV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/14/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FPAG ACWV | -2.08%+0.15% | +3.39%+3.90% | +13.00%+7.06% | +17.21%+7.45% | +76.03%+37.62% | n/a+32.04% |
| Flows | FPAG ACWV | +$20M- | +$64M-$24M | +$267M-$131M | +$315M-$97M | +$464M-$2.33B | --$2.49B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FPAG ACWV | +12.21%+7.52% | +13.64%+7.11% | +14.36%+8.25% | n/a+9.65% |
| Max drawdown | FPAG ACWV | -3.55%-2.30% | -11.52%-6.22% | -16.98%-7.33% | n/a-18.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | FPAG ACWV | 16d12d | 94d148d | 104d27d | n/a784d |
Trading data
FPAG | ACWV | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 7:47 PM | $41.65 | $126.01 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $41.91 | $125.99 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FPAG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFPAG | ACWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/15/2026 at 7:47 PM
Live
Closed
FPAG | ACWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.65 | $126.01 |
| 1D performance | -0.62% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $617.73 M | $3.36 B |
| E/R | 0.86% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
FPAG | ACWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Pacific Advisors | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index |
| N° of holdings | 9706 | 378 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 17, 2021 | October 18, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FPAG
USA
52.45%
Netherlands
10.53%
Ireland
7.43%
Other
29.59%
ACWV
USA
55.97%
Japan
9.99%
Other
34.03%
Sectors
FPAG
Technology
20.69%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
14.15%
Healthcare
11.99%
Industrials
10.5%
Finance
10.43%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.38%
Other
21.86%
ACWV
Technology
23.72%
Finance
14.27%
Healthcare
13.81%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.74%
Telecommunication.
9.99%
Utilities
7.16%
Other
20.31%
Advertisement
Diversification
FPAG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
46.57%
ACWV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.78%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FPAG
Alphabet, Inc.
4.32%
US9220408457
3.89%
Analog Devices, Inc.
3.67%
Heineken Holding NV
3.64%
International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc.
3.51%
Citigroup, Inc.
3.30%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.14%
Safran SA
2.96%
Becton, Dickinson & Co.
2.85%
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
2.76%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.71%
The Magnum Ice Cream Co. N.V.
2.51%
Glencore Plc
2.50%
Comcast Corp.
2.40%
Aon Plc
2.40%
ACWV
Johnson & Johnson
1.56%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.43%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.21%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.20%
Microsoft Corp.
1.17%
Cencora, Inc.
1.13%
KDDI Corp.
1.10%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.10%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.08%
The Southern Co.
1.08%
Waste Management, Inc.
1.02%
Chubb Ltd.
0.98%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.94%
McKesson Corp.
0.89%
Novartis AG
0.89%
Frequently asked questions about FPAG and ACWV
How have the FPAG and ACWV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 14, 2026, FPAG is up 13% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWV has returned 7.06%. That puts FPAG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FPAG or ACWV?
Year-to-date, the FPAG ETF saw +$267M in flows, compared to -$131M for ACWV.
Which ETF is more volatile: FPAG or ACWV?
Over the past year, FPAG had a volatility of 13.64%, while ACWV experienced 7.11%.
Which ETF is bigger: FPAG or ACWV?
As of September 14, 2026, FPAG holds $617.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACWV manages $3.36 B.
What sectors do the FPAG and ACWV ETFs invest in?
FPAG leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. Meanwhile, ACWV focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FPAG ETF and ACWV ETF?
FPAG top holdings include Alphabet, Inc., US9220408457 and Analog Devices, Inc.. ACWV holds in its top three: Johnson & Johnson, Cisco Systems, Inc. and Duke Energy Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FPAG or ACWV?
FPAG holds 10019 securities with 46.57% of its assets in the top 15. ACWV has 379 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.78%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
