Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FNGSvsIWFGETF Comparison
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) belongs to the Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity segment. NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. FNGS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 1.2% for IWFG. FNGS is down -4.83% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. IWFG performs worse with -7.41% YTD performance, and -$42K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNGS and IWFG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FNGS vs IWFG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FNGS IWFG | +1.27%-1.97% | -9.52%-8.73% | -4.83%-7.41% | +30.15%+15.54% | +177.98%+89.98% | +126.53%n/a |
| Flows | FNGS IWFG | --$515K | --$42K | --$42K | -+$46M | +$206M+$48M | +$206M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FNGS IWFG | +19.44%+16.75% | +26.81%+22.62% | +25.53%+19.53% | +30.01%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FNGS IWFG | -15.23%-10.20% | -17.87%-14.95% | -26.06%-21.89% | -48.88%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FNGS IWFG | 90d89d | 131d37d | 105d133d | 617dn/a |
FNGS | IWFG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $64.76 | $49.25 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $64.72 | $49.30 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FNGS | IWFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FNGS | IWFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $64.76 | $49.25 |
| 1D performance | +0.07% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $486.26 M | $54.90 M |
| E/R | 0.58% | 1.2% |
FNGS | IWFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | BMO | New York Life Investments |
| Benchmark | NYSE FANG+ Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 10 | 24 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 21, 2019 | June 23, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FNGS and IWFG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, FNGS is down -4.83% year-to-date (YTD), while IWFG has lost -7.41%. That puts FNGS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNGS or IWFG?
Year-to-date, the FNGS ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$42K for IWFG.
Which ETF is more volatile: FNGS or IWFG?
Over the past year, FNGS had a volatility of 26.81%, while IWFG experienced 22.62%.
Which ETF is bigger: FNGS or IWFG?
As of March 9, 2026, FNGS holds $486.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWFG manages $54.90 M.
What sectors do the FNGS and IWFG ETFs invest in?
FNGS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWFG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FNGS ETF and IWFG ETF?
FNGS top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, NVIDIA and AMAZON.COM INC. IWFG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and AMAZON.COM INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: FNGS or IWFG?
FNGS has 10 securities. IWFG has 24 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.95%.
Barry Peters from Winslow Capital discusses IWFG
What’s Driving the Market, a Look at US Equities
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
