BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

FNGSvsGXPCETF Comparison

ETF 1

FNGS

MicroSectors FANG+ ETN

This fund is part of

Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity

-0.03%

Full FNGS fund page

VS

ETF 2

GXPC

Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF

This fund is part of

US Communication Services Sector

-0.53%

Full GXPC fund page

MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) belongs to the Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity segment. Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) is part of the US Communication Services Sector segment. FNGS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Business Services. FNGS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.25% for GXPC. FNGS is up 17.19% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. GXPC performs worse with 0.05% YTD performance, and +$59M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNGS and GXPC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

FNGS vs GXPC performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 09/08/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	FNGS GXPC	-1.02%-2.32%	+7.52%-3.20%	+17.19%+0.05%	+16.70%+5.97%	+136.73%n/a	+145.63%n/a
Flows	FNGS GXPC	-+$4M	-+$37M	-+$59M	-+$106M	+$153M-	+$206M-

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	FNGS GXPC	+24.53%+27.86%	+22.70%+22.16%	+25.53%n/a	+30.38%n/a
Max drawdown	FNGS GXPC	-7.49%-11.37%	-22.94%-16.47%	-26.06%n/a	-48.88%n/a
Max drawdown duration	FNGS GXPC	19d56d	190d73d	105dn/a	617dn/a

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	FNGS	GXPC
Last sale 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM	$79.42	$29.72
Previous close 09/09/2026	$79.98	$29.68
Consolidated volume 09/09/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of August 31, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	FNGS	GXPC
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	FNGS	GXPC
Last price	$79.42	$29.72
1D performance	-0.70%	+0.13%
AuM	$598.78 M	$114.21 M
E/R	0.58%	0.25%

Characteristics

	FNGS	GXPC
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	BMO	Global X
Benchmark	NYSE FANG+ Index	MSCI USA Communication Services Index
N° of holdings	10	-
Asset class	Equities	-
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	November 21, 2019	July 23, 2025
ESG	No	No

More FNGS data on Trackinsight

More GXPC data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

FNGS

USA

99.36%

Other

0.64%

GXPC

Data will be available soon

Sectors

FNGS

Technology

78.63%

Consumer Non-Cycl.

11.36%

Business Services

9.37%

Other

0.64%

GXPC

Data will be available soon

Diversification

FNGS

Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10

99.36%

GXPC

Data will be available soon

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026

FNGS

Microsoft Corp.

12.17%

Amazon.com, Inc.

11.36%

Apple, Inc.

10.38%

Broadcom Inc.

9.84%

NVIDIA Corp.

9.74%

Alphabet, Inc.

9.73%

Meta Platforms, Inc.

9.72%

Palantir Technologies, Inc.

9.37%

Netflix, Inc.

9.26%

Micron Technology, Inc.

7.79%

GXPC

Data will be available soon

Frequently asked questions about FNGS and GXPC

How have the FNGS and GXPC ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 8, 2026, FNGS is up 17.19% year-to-date (YTD), while GXPC has returned 0.05%. That puts FNGS better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNGS or GXPC?

Year-to-date, the FNGS ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$59M for GXPC.

Which ETF is more volatile: FNGS or GXPC?

Over the past year, FNGS had a volatility of 22.7%, while GXPC experienced 22.16%.

Which ETF is bigger: FNGS or GXPC?

As of September 8, 2026, FNGS holds $598.78 M in assets under management (AUM), while GXPC manages $114.21 M.

What’s Driving the Market, a Look at US Equities

June 14, 2023

FNGS

FNGSvsGXPCETF Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ ETN

Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF

FNGS vs GXPC performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the FNGS and GXPC ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 8, 2026, FNGS is up 17.19% year-to-date (YTD), while GXPC has returned 0.05%. That puts FNGS better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNGS or GXPC?

Year-to-date, the FNGS ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$59M for GXPC.

Which ETF is more volatile: FNGS or GXPC?

Over the past year, FNGS had a volatility of 22.7%, while GXPC experienced 22.16%.

Which ETF is bigger: FNGS or GXPC?

As of September 8, 2026, FNGS holds $598.78 M in assets under management (AUM), while GXPC manages $114.21 M.

What’s Driving the Market, a Look at US Equities

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up