Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FNDXvsRWLETF Comparison
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF (FNDX) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. FNDX's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, RWL's top sector exposures are Health Care, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. FNDX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.39% for RWL. FNDX is up 2.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$963M in YTD flows. RWL performs worse with 1.33% YTD performance, and +$783M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNDX and RWL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FNDX vs RWL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FNDX RWL | -3.68%-3.66% | +1.88%+0.62% | +2.38%+1.33% | +23.08%+21.71% | +68.12%+67.31% | +75.10%+80.08% |
| Flows | FNDX RWL | +$334M+$541M | +$1.23B+$856M | +$963M+$783M | +$2.95B+$2.05B | +$6.38B+$4.80B | +$10.21B+$5.47B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FNDX RWL | +10.73%+10.04% | +16.45%+15.37% | +13.43%+12.59% | +15.36%+14.59% |
| Max drawdown | FNDX RWL | -4.57%-4.20% | -12.73%-11.32% | -16.26%-14.07% | -18.97%-17.55% |
| Max drawdown duration | FNDX RWL | 30d12d | 52d46d | 131d127d | 545d468d |
FNDX | RWL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.86 | $116.02 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $27.93 | $116.19 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FNDX | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FNDX | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.86 | $116.02 |
| 1D performance | -0.25% | -0.15% |
| AuM | $23.59 B | $8.15 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.39% |
FNDX | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index | S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index |
| N° of holdings | 659 | 479 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 15, 2013 | February 22, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FNDX and RWL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, FNDX is up 2.38% year-to-date (YTD), while RWL has returned 1.33%. That puts FNDX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNDX or RWL?
Year-to-date, the FNDX ETF saw +$963M in flows, compared to +$783M for RWL.
Which ETF is more volatile: FNDX or RWL?
Over the past year, FNDX had a volatility of 16.45%, while RWL experienced 15.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: FNDX or RWL?
As of March 13, 2026, FNDX holds $23.59 B in assets under management (AUM), while RWL manages $8.15 B.
What sectors do the FNDX and RWL ETFs invest in?
FNDX leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, RWL focuses on Health Care, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FNDX ETF and RWL ETF?
FNDX top holdings include APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and EXXON. RWL holds in its top three: WALMART INC, AMAZON.COM INC and UNITEDHEALTH GRP.
Which ETF is more diversified: FNDX or RWL?
FNDX holds 691 securities with 27.31% of its assets in the top 15. RWL has 503 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.53%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
