Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FNDXvsPRFETF Comparison
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF (FNDX) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. FNDX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.34% for PRF. FNDX is up 3.69% year-to-date (YTD) with +$945M in YTD flows. PRF performs worse with 3.07% YTD performance, and +$35M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNDX and PRF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FNDX vs PRF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FNDX PRF | -2.90%-3.04% | +3.10%+2.55% | +3.69%+3.07% | +21.66%+22.16% | +68.55%+67.42% | +80.00%+75.13% |
| Flows | FNDX PRF | +$400M+$55M | +$1.23B+$65M | +$945M+$35M | +$2.92B-$48M | +$6.36B-$172M | +$10.21B+$698M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FNDX PRF | +10.55%+10.81% | +16.48%+16.19% | +13.44%+13.34% | +15.36%+15.13% |
| Max drawdown | FNDX PRF | -3.35%-3.44% | -12.73%-12.61% | -16.26%-15.88% | -18.97%-19.68% |
| Max drawdown duration | FNDX PRF | 27d27d | 52d51d | 131d211d | 545d695d |
FNDX | PRF | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.26 | $48.38 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $28.22 | $48.35 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FNDX | PRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FNDX | PRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.26 | $48.38 |
| 1D performance | +0.14% | +0.06% |
| AuM | $23.87 B | $8.86 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.34% |
FNDX | PRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 659 | 931 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 15, 2013 | December 19, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FNDX and PRF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FNDX is up 3.69% year-to-date (YTD), while PRF has returned 3.07%. That puts FNDX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNDX or PRF?
Year-to-date, the FNDX ETF saw +$945M in flows, compared to +$35M for PRF.
Which ETF is more volatile: FNDX or PRF?
Over the past year, FNDX had a volatility of 16.48%, while PRF experienced 16.19%.
Which ETF is bigger: FNDX or PRF?
As of March 10, 2026, FNDX holds $23.87 B in assets under management (AUM), while PRF manages $8.86 B.
What sectors do the FNDX and PRF ETFs invest in?
FNDX leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, PRF focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the FNDX ETF and PRF ETF?
FNDX top holdings include APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and EXXON. PRF holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FNDX or PRF?
FNDX holds 691 securities with 27.31% of its assets in the top 15. PRF has 982 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.71%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
