Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FNDFvsSCHFETF Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. FNDF's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, SCHF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. FNDF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.03% for SCHF. FNDF is up 7.55% year-to-date (YTD) with +$581M in YTD flows. SCHF performs worse with 3.91% YTD performance, and +$862M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNDF and SCHF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FNDF vs SCHF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FNDF SCHF | -5.01%-5.47% | +9.25%+5.58% | +7.55%+3.91% | +38.73%+29.79% | +78.01%+64.42% | +79.59%+55.52% |
| Flows | FNDF SCHF | +$384M+$486M | +$1.13B+$2.35B | +$581M+$862M | +$2.05B+$3.76B | +$5.07B+$11.19B | +$8.74B+$18.82B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FNDF SCHF | +16.20%+15.20% | +15.58%+15.58% | +13.58%+13.40% | +14.47%+14.45% |
| Max drawdown | FNDF SCHF | -9.15%-8.50% | -13.78%-13.56% | -13.78%-13.58% | -25.58%-28.95% |
| Max drawdown duration | FNDF SCHF | 11d11d | 44d41d | 44d211d | 545d897d |
FNDF | SCHF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 5:51 PM | $48.05 | $24.65 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $48.42 | $24.88 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FNDF | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FNDF | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.05 | $24.65 |
| 1D performance | -0.76% | -0.92% |
| AuM | $21.64 B | $58.37 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.03% |
FNDF | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index | FTSE Developed ex US Index |
| N° of holdings | 821 | 1360 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 15, 2013 | November 3, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FNDF and SCHF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, FNDF is up 7.55% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHF has returned 3.91%. That puts FNDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNDF or SCHF?
Year-to-date, the FNDF ETF saw +$581M in flows, compared to +$862M for SCHF.
Which ETF is more volatile: FNDF or SCHF?
Over the past year, FNDF had a volatility of 15.58%, while SCHF experienced 15.58%.
Which ETF is bigger: FNDF or SCHF?
As of March 12, 2026, FNDF holds $21.64 B in assets under management (AUM), while SCHF manages $58.37 B.
What sectors do the FNDF and SCHF ETFs invest in?
FNDF leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, SCHF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FNDF ETF and SCHF ETF?
FNDF top holdings include SAMSUNG ELECTR, SHELL PLC and TOTALENERGIES SE. SCHF holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, SAMSUNG ELECTR and ROCHE.
Which ETF is more diversified: FNDF or SCHF?
FNDF holds 865 securities with 18.13% of its assets in the top 15. SCHF has 1431 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.85%.
Should you add international equities to your investment portfolio?
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
