FNDFvsINEQETF Comparison
ETF 1
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+1.12%
VS
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and Columbia International Equity Income ETF - USD (INEQ) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. FNDF's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, INEQ's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. FNDF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.46% for INEQ. FNDF is up 18.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.02B in YTD flows. INEQ performs worse with 7.45% YTD performance, and +$36M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNDF and INEQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FNDF vs INEQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/12/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FNDF INEQ | +1.58%-1.09% | +10.22%+3.23% | +18.54%+7.45% | +39.66%+23.49% | +86.57%+70.83% | +84.52%+74.79% |
| Flows | FNDF INEQ | +$89M+$8M | +$439M+$4M | +$1.02B+$36M | +$2.09B+$43M | +$5.19B+$69M | +$8.73B+$70M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FNDF INEQ | +17.68%+14.03% | +14.01%+12.47% | +14.06%+14.66% | +14.78%+14.60% |
| Max drawdown | FNDF INEQ | -4.32%-4.14% | -10.49%-9.21% | -13.78%-15.76% | -25.58%-24.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | FNDF INEQ | 9d54d | 65d103d | 44d47d | 545d580d |
Trading data
FNDF | INEQ | |
Last sale 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.10 | $39.95 |
| Previous close 06/11/2026 | $53.89 | $39.73 |
| Consolidated volume 06/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
INEQ
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFNDF | INEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FNDF | INEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.10 | $39.95 |
| 1D performance | +0.39% | +0.55% |
| AuM | $24.30 B | $87.32 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.46% |
Characteristics
FNDF | INEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 825 | 94 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 15, 2013 | June 13, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FNDF
Japan
22.42%
United Kingdom
13.72%
Republic of Korea
9.6%
Canada
8.73%
France
8.17%
Germany
7.56%
Other
29.81%
INEQ
Japan
28.04%
United Kingdom
15.35%
Germany
13.93%
France
9.56%
Australia
9.41%
Other
23.72%
Sectors
FNDF
Financials
16.46%
Industrials
14.64%
Energy
11.78%
Materials
10.87%
Consumer Discreti.
10.85%
Information Techn.
10.02%
Other
25.39%
INEQ
Financials
16.38%
Industrials
12.59%
Health Care
11.48%
Energy
11.48%
Materials
10.25%
Consumer Staples
7.27%
Other
30.55%
Advertisement
Diversification
FNDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.63%
INEQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
51.28%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
FNDF
SAMSUNG ELECTR
4.20%
SHELL PLC
2.52%
TOTALENERGIES SE
1.88%
GLENCORE PLC
1.31%
BP
1.29%
BHP GROUP LTD
1.18%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.03%
TOYOTA
0.97%
CH1499059983
0.86%
RIO TINTO
0.81%
SK HYNIX
0.77%
BANCO SANTANDER SA
0.75%
NESTLE SA
0.74%
MERCEDES-BENZ GROUP AG
0.67%
MITSUBISHI
0.66%
INEQ
TOTALENERGIES SE
5.46%
SHELL PLC
5.21%
BHP GROUP LTD
5.17%
GSK PLC
4.18%
UNICREDIT SPA
4.06%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
3.81%
KEYENCE
3.30%
MUNICH RE
3.21%
TOKIO MARINE HOLDINGS
2.95%
VINCI
2.90%
ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV SA/NV
2.41%
HOYA
2.36%
GB00BM8PJY71
2.35%
DEUTSCHE POST
1.98%
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL
1.96%
Frequently asked questions about FNDF and INEQ
How have the FNDF and INEQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 12, 2026, FNDF is up 18.54% year-to-date (YTD), while INEQ has returned 7.45%. That puts FNDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNDF or INEQ?
Year-to-date, the FNDF ETF saw +$1.02B in flows, compared to +$36M for INEQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: FNDF or INEQ?
Over the past year, FNDF had a volatility of 14.01%, while INEQ experienced 12.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: FNDF or INEQ?
As of June 12, 2026, FNDF holds $24.30 B in assets under management (AUM), while INEQ manages $87.32 M.
What sectors do the FNDF and INEQ ETFs invest in?
FNDF leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, INEQ focuses on Financials, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the FNDF ETF and INEQ ETF?
FNDF top holdings include SAMSUNG ELECTR, SHELL PLC and TOTALENERGIES SE. INEQ holds in its top three: TOTALENERGIES SE, SHELL PLC and BHP GROUP LTD.
Which ETF is more diversified: FNDF or INEQ?
FNDF holds 874 securities with 19.63% of its assets in the top 15. INEQ has 94 securities and a top 15 weight of 51.28%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
