FNDFvsINEQETF Comparison
ETF 1
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.24%
VS
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and Columbia International Equity Income ETF - USD (INEQ) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Energy. FNDF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.46% for INEQ. FNDF is up 12.63% year-to-date (YTD) with +$665M in YTD flows. INEQ performs worse with 6.54% YTD performance, and +$28M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNDF and INEQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FNDF vs INEQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FNDF INEQ | +6.50%+3.22% | +4.73%+2.83% | +12.63%+6.54% | +42.55%+33.81% | +78.26%+70.94% | +84.65%+78.61% |
| Flows | FNDF INEQ | +$62M-$4M | +$665M+$24M | +$665M+$28M | +$1.86B+$39M | +$5.13B+$61M | +$8.56B+$62M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FNDF INEQ | +20.53%+16.59% | +13.25%+12.51% | +13.90%+14.68% | +14.71%+14.61% |
| Max drawdown | FNDF INEQ | -10.49%-9.21% | -10.49%-9.21% | -13.78%-15.76% | -25.58%-24.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | FNDF INEQ | 57d54d | 57d54d | 44d47d | 545d580d |
Trading data
FNDF | INEQ | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $50.93 | $39.48 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $50.96 | $39.34 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
INEQ
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFNDF | INEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FNDF | INEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.93 | $39.48 |
| 1D performance | -0.06% | +0.36% |
| AuM | $22.74 B | $78.71 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.46% |
Characteristics
FNDF | INEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 825 | 99 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 15, 2013 | June 13, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FNDF
Japan
23.57%
United Kingdom
13.86%
Canada
8.77%
Republic of Korea
8.36%
France
8.19%
Germany
7.62%
Other
29.64%
INEQ
Japan
28.4%
United Kingdom
17.09%
Germany
14.62%
France
9.85%
Australia
8.6%
Other
21.43%
Sectors
FNDF
Financials
16.15%
Industrials
14.73%
Energy
12.79%
Consumer Discreti.
11.21%
Materials
10.44%
Information Techn.
8.69%
Other
26%
INEQ
Financials
20.94%
Industrials
13.22%
Energy
12.42%
Health Care
11.81%
Materials
9.27%
Communication Ser.
7.65%
Other
24.69%
Advertisement
Diversification
FNDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.48%
INEQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.67%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
FNDF
SAMSUNG ELECTR
3.57%
SHELL PLC
2.75%
TOTALENERGIES SE
2.00%
BP
1.36%
GLENCORE PLC
1.29%
TOYOTA
1.12%
BHP GROUP LTD
1.07%
HSBC HOLDINGS
0.97%
CH1499059983
0.87%
MITSUBISHI
0.79%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
0.77%
RIO TINTO
0.73%
MERCEDES-BENZ GROUP AG
0.73%
NESTLE SA
0.73%
BANCO SANTANDER SA
0.72%
INEQ
TOTALENERGIES SE
5.75%
SHELL PLC
5.68%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
4.53%
BHP GROUP LTD
4.50%
GSK PLC
4.24%
UNICREDIT SPA
3.83%
DBS GROUP HOLDINGS
3.50%
MUNICH RE
3.20%
TOKIO MARINE HOLDINGS
3.06%
VINCI
2.91%
KEYENCE
2.53%
ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV SA/NV
2.30%
GB00BM8PJY71
2.24%
HOYA
2.22%
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL
2.17%
Frequently asked questions about FNDF and INEQ
How have the FNDF and INEQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 27, 2026, FNDF is up 12.63% year-to-date (YTD), while INEQ has returned 6.54%. That puts FNDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNDF or INEQ?
Year-to-date, the FNDF ETF saw +$665M in flows, compared to +$28M for INEQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: FNDF or INEQ?
Over the past year, FNDF had a volatility of 13.25%, while INEQ experienced 12.51%.
Which ETF is bigger: FNDF or INEQ?
As of April 27, 2026, FNDF holds $22.74 B in assets under management (AUM), while INEQ manages $78.71 M.
What sectors do the FNDF and INEQ ETFs invest in?
FNDF leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, INEQ focuses on Financials, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the FNDF ETF and INEQ ETF?
FNDF top holdings include SAMSUNG ELECTR, SHELL PLC and TOTALENERGIES SE. INEQ holds in its top three: TOTALENERGIES SE, SHELL PLC and DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: FNDF or INEQ?
FNDF holds 874 securities with 19.48% of its assets in the top 15. INEQ has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 52.67%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
