Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FNDBvsRWLETF Comparison
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) belongs to the US All Cap segment. Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) is part of the US Large Cap segment. FNDB's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, RWL's top sector exposures are Health Care, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. FNDB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.39% for RWL. FNDB is up 2.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$57M in YTD flows. RWL performs worse with 1.49% YTD performance, and +$783M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNDB and RWL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FNDB vs RWL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FNDB RWL | -3.22%-2.77% | +1.89%+0.90% | +2.54%+1.49% | +22.00%+21.05% | +66.41%+67.58% | +71.91%+81.12% |
| Flows | FNDB RWL | +$24M+$565M | +$68M+$858M | +$57M+$783M | +$87M+$2.05B | +$321M+$4.80B | +$479M+$5.47B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FNDB RWL | +11.09%+10.03% | +16.78%+15.38% | +13.77%+12.60% | +15.66%+14.59% |
| Max drawdown | FNDB RWL | -4.63%-4.05% | -12.93%-11.32% | -16.85%-14.07% | -19.24%-17.55% |
| Max drawdown duration | FNDB RWL | 29d11d | 52d46d | 213d127d | 546d468d |
FNDB | RWL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.17 | $116.02 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $27.23 | $116.19 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FNDB | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FNDB | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.17 | $116.02 |
| 1D performance | -0.22% | -0.15% |
| AuM | $1.13 B | $8.16 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.39% |
FNDB | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index | S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index |
| N° of holdings | 1290 | 479 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 15, 2013 | February 22, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FNDB and RWL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, FNDB is up 2.54% year-to-date (YTD), while RWL has returned 1.49%. That puts FNDB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNDB or RWL?
Year-to-date, the FNDB ETF saw +$57M in flows, compared to +$783M for RWL.
Which ETF is more volatile: FNDB or RWL?
Over the past year, FNDB had a volatility of 16.78%, while RWL experienced 15.38%.
Which ETF is bigger: FNDB or RWL?
As of March 12, 2026, FNDB holds $1.13 B in assets under management (AUM), while RWL manages $8.16 B.
What sectors do the FNDB and RWL ETFs invest in?
FNDB leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, RWL focuses on Health Care, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FNDB ETF and RWL ETF?
FNDB top holdings include APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and EXXON. RWL holds in its top three: WALMART INC, AMAZON.COM INC and UNITEDHEALTH GRP.
Which ETF is more diversified: FNDB or RWL?
FNDB holds 1372 securities with 25.76% of its assets in the top 15. RWL has 503 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.53%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.