FNDBvsREVSETF Comparison
VS
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) belongs to the US All Cap segment. Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. FNDB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.2% for REVS. FNDB is up 19.82% year-to-date (YTD) with +$230M in YTD flows. REVS performs worse with 19.81% YTD performance, and +$166M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNDB and REVS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FNDB vs REVS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FNDB REVS | -0.16%-0.09% | +4.54%+6.96% | +19.82%+19.81% | +25.24%+23.58% | +74.78%+72.66% | +89.11%+82.58% |
| Flows | FNDB REVS | +$19M+$7M | +$96M+$27M | +$230M+$166M | +$237M+$221M | +$468M+$268M | +$604M+$278M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FNDB REVS | +8.26%+9.86% | +10.63%+11.13% | +13.47%+13.15% | +15.42%+15.00% |
| Max drawdown | FNDB REVS | -1.90%-2.42% | -6.34%-6.87% | -16.85%-16.16% | -19.24%-17.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | FNDB REVS | 26d8d | 63d66d | 213d211d | 546d448d |
Trading data
FNDB | REVS | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.58 | $33.81 |
| Previous close 09/11/2026 | $31.32 | $33.54 |
| Consolidated volume 09/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FNDB | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FNDB | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.58 | $33.81 |
| 1D performance | +0.83% | +0.80% |
| AuM | $1.49 B | $353.05 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
FNDB | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 1411 | 296 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 15, 2013 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FNDB
USA
97.64%
Other
2.36%
REVS
USA
98.47%
Other
1.53%
Sectors
FNDB
Technology
22.65%
Finance
17.87%
Healthcare
11.95%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.56%
Energy
9.64%
Industrials
8.04%
Other
19.3%
REVS
Technology
22.61%
Finance
20.98%
Healthcare
11.11%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.92%
Industrials
8.57%
Other
25.81%
Advertisement
Diversification
FNDB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
26.05%
REVS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.59%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FNDB
Apple, Inc.
4.81%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.31%
Microsoft Corp.
2.18%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.72%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.65%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.62%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.56%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.55%
Chevron Corp.
1.47%
Intel Corp.
1.47%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.38%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.28%
Johnson & Johnson
1.07%
Bank of America Corp.
1.03%
Walmart, Inc.
0.95%
REVS
Apple, Inc.
7.96%
Microsoft Corp.
6.97%
Bank of America Corp.
3.80%
Chevron Corp.
2.82%
Altria Group, Inc.
2.15%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.84%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
1.77%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.73%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
1.68%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.59%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.53%
CVS Health Corp.
1.49%
General Motors Co.
1.48%
Newmont Corp.
1.44%
The Progressive Corp.
1.34%
Frequently asked questions about FNDB and REVS
How have the FNDB and REVS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, FNDB is up 19.82% year-to-date (YTD), while REVS has returned 19.81%. That puts FNDB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNDB or REVS?
Year-to-date, the FNDB ETF saw +$230M in flows, compared to +$166M for REVS.
Which ETF is more volatile: FNDB or REVS?
Over the past year, FNDB had a volatility of 10.63%, while REVS experienced 11.13%.
Which ETF is bigger: FNDB or REVS?
As of September 11, 2026, FNDB holds $1.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while REVS manages $353.05 M.
What sectors do the FNDB and REVS ETFs invest in?
FNDB leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, REVS focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FNDB ETF and REVS ETF?
FNDB top holdings include Apple, Inc., ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. and Microsoft Corp.. REVS holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Bank of America Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FNDB or REVS?
FNDB holds 1412 securities with 26.05% of its assets in the top 15. REVS has 298 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.59%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
