FNDBvsREVSETF Comparison
VS
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) belongs to the US All Cap segment. Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. FNDB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.2% for REVS. FNDB is up 21.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$234M in YTD flows. REVS performs better with 22.23% YTD performance, and +$207M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNDB and REVS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FNDB vs REVS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FNDB REVS | +3.91%+4.83% | +4.18%+3.74% | +21.73%+22.23% | +24.54%+25.78% | +89.97%+88.78% | +86.66%+83.33% |
| Flows | FNDB REVS | +$40K+$39M | +$46M+$55M | +$234M+$207M | +$250M+$261M | +$434M+$308M | +$603M+$318M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FNDB REVS | +7.77%+9.16% | +10.27%+11.02% | +13.28%+13.01% | +15.30%+14.91% |
| Max drawdown | FNDB REVS | -3.80%-4.80% | -6.34%-6.87% | -16.85%-16.16% | -19.24%-17.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | FNDB REVS | 66d55d | 63d66d | 213d211d | 546d448d |
Trading data
FNDB | REVS | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.79 | $34.50 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $31.97 | $34.10 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FNDB | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FNDB | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.79 | $34.50 |
| 1D performance | -0.56% | +1.17% |
| AuM | $1.51 B | $402.44 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
FNDB | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 1408 | 295 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 15, 2013 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FNDB
USA
97.18%
Other
2.82%
REVS
USA
98.49%
Other
1.51%
Sectors
FNDB
Technology
24.07%
Finance
17.23%
Healthcare
12.44%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.52%
Energy
9.69%
Industrials
7.33%
Other
18.72%
REVS
Technology
25.48%
Finance
19.57%
Healthcare
11.24%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.94%
Industrials
7.92%
Other
24.85%
Diversification
FNDB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.3%
REVS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.2%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
FNDB
Apple, Inc.
4.81%
Microsoft Corp.
3.05%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.23%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.93%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.91%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.74%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.67%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.58%
Chevron Corp.
1.51%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.40%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.34%
Intel Corp.
1.20%
Johnson & Johnson
1.04%
Walmart, Inc.
0.96%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
0.91%
REVS
Apple, Inc.
8.87%
Microsoft Corp.
7.71%
Bank of America Corp.
3.29%
Chevron Corp.
2.95%
Altria Group, Inc.
2.34%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.33%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.82%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.70%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
1.64%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.54%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
1.51%
CVS Health Corp.
1.43%
General Motors Co.
1.40%
The Progressive Corp.
1.36%
Newmont Corp.
1.31%
Frequently asked questions about FNDB and REVS
How have the FNDB and REVS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, FNDB is up 21.73% year-to-date (YTD), while REVS has returned 22.23%. That puts REVS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNDB or REVS?
Year-to-date, the FNDB ETF saw +$234M in flows, compared to +$207M for REVS.
Which ETF is more volatile: FNDB or REVS?
Over the past year, FNDB had a volatility of 10.27%, while REVS experienced 11.02%.
Which ETF is bigger: FNDB or REVS?
As of October 29, 2026, FNDB holds $1.51 B in assets under management (AUM), while REVS manages $402.44 M.
What sectors do the FNDB and REVS ETFs invest in?
FNDB leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, REVS focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FNDB ETF and REVS ETF?
FNDB top holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.. REVS holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Bank of America Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FNDB or REVS?
FNDB holds 1410 securities with 27.3% of its assets in the top 15. REVS has 297 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.2%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
