FNDBvsPRFETF Comparison
VS
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) belongs to the US All Cap segment. Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. FNDB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.34% for PRF. FNDB is up 20.96% year-to-date (YTD) with +$234M in YTD flows. PRF performs better with 21.26% YTD performance, and -$147M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNDB and PRF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FNDB vs PRF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FNDB PRF | +2.88%+2.56% | +2.44%+2.82% | +20.96%+21.26% | +23.14%+23.91% | +88.76%+92.67% | +85.07%+84.56% |
| Flows | FNDB PRF | +$40K+$11M | +$47M+$54M | +$234M-$147M | +$241M-$93M | +$434M-$279M | +$606M+$336M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FNDB PRF | +7.98%+8.20% | +10.27%+10.48% | +13.28%+12.94% | +15.30%+14.90% |
| Max drawdown | FNDB PRF | -3.80%-3.38% | -6.34%-6.61% | -16.85%-15.88% | -19.24%-19.68% |
| Max drawdown duration | FNDB PRF | 66d48d | 63d61d | 213d211d | 546d695d |
Trading data
FNDB | PRF | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.78 | $56.33 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $31.72 | $56.22 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FNDB | PRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FNDB | PRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.78 | $56.33 |
| 1D performance | +0.19% | +0.20% |
| AuM | $1.50 B | $10.12 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.34% |
Characteristics
FNDB | PRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 1412 | 995 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 15, 2013 | December 19, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FNDB
USA
97.64%
Other
2.36%
PRF
USA
97.5%
Other
2.5%
Sectors
FNDB
Technology
22.57%
Finance
17.6%
Healthcare
12.6%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.38%
Energy
10.09%
Industrials
7.63%
Other
19.13%
PRF
Technology
25.42%
Finance
19.06%
Healthcare
12.87%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.32%
Energy
8.26%
Industrials
7.9%
Other
17.16%
Diversification
FNDB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
26.07%
PRF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.93%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FNDB
Apple, Inc.
4.32%
Microsoft Corp.
2.68%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.34%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.80%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.56%
Chevron Corp.
1.52%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.44%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.41%
Intel Corp.
1.37%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.19%
Johnson & Johnson
1.07%
Bank of America Corp.
1.01%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
0.98%
PRF
Apple, Inc.
4.33%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.43%
Microsoft Corp.
2.80%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.16%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.83%
Intel Corp.
1.77%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.76%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.69%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.38%
Chevron Corp.
1.30%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.24%
Bank of America Corp.
1.22%
Johnson & Johnson
1.14%
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.98%
Citigroup, Inc.
0.89%
Frequently asked questions about FNDB and PRF
How have the FNDB and PRF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 28, 2026, FNDB is up 20.96% year-to-date (YTD), while PRF has returned 21.26%. That puts PRF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNDB or PRF?
Year-to-date, the FNDB ETF saw +$234M in flows, compared to -$147M for PRF.
Which ETF is more volatile: FNDB or PRF?
Over the past year, FNDB had a volatility of 10.27%, while PRF experienced 10.48%.
Which ETF is bigger: FNDB or PRF?
As of October 28, 2026, FNDB holds $1.50 B in assets under management (AUM), while PRF manages $10.12 B.
What sectors do the FNDB and PRF ETFs invest in?
FNDB leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, PRF focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FNDB ETF and PRF ETF?
FNDB top holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.. PRF holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FNDB or PRF?
FNDB holds 1413 securities with 26.07% of its assets in the top 15. PRF has 995 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.93%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
