FNDBvsPRFETF Comparison
VS
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) belongs to the US All Cap segment. Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. FNDB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.34% for PRF. FNDB is up 17.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$187M in YTD flows. PRF performs worse with 17.22% YTD performance, and -$201M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNDB and PRF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FNDB vs PRF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FNDB PRF | +1.48%+1.08% | +7.37%+7.62% | +17.30%+17.22% | +28.20%+28.40% | +67.51%+70.87% | +87.45%+86.17% |
| Flows | FNDB PRF | +$34M-$16M | +$107M-$281M | +$187M-$201M | +$200M-$211M | +$431M-$332M | +$564M+$352M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FNDB PRF | +9.69%+10.29% | +10.86%+10.93% | +13.53%+13.16% | +15.46%+15.04% |
| Max drawdown | FNDB PRF | -2.16%-2.51% | -6.34%-6.61% | -16.85%-15.88% | -19.24%-19.68% |
| Max drawdown duration | FNDB PRF | 7d7d | 63d61d | 213d211d | 546d695d |
Trading data
FNDB | PRF | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 4:09 PM | $31.14 | $54.94 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $30.92 | $54.59 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FNDB | PRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 4:09 PM
Live
Closed
FNDB | PRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.14 | $54.94 |
| 1D performance | +0.70% | +0.64% |
| AuM | $1.42 B | $9.77 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.34% |
Characteristics
FNDB | PRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 1408 | 995 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 15, 2013 | December 19, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FNDB
USA
97.63%
Other
2.37%
PRF
USA
97.3%
Other
2.7%
Sectors
FNDB
Technology
23.83%
Finance
17.49%
Healthcare
11.57%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.74%
Energy
8.8%
Industrials
7.9%
Other
19.66%
PRF
Technology
25.85%
Finance
19.02%
Healthcare
12.23%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.58%
Industrials
7.97%
Energy
7.22%
Other
18.12%
Advertisement
Diversification
FNDB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
26.11%
PRF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.92%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
FNDB
Apple, Inc.
4.29%
Intel Corp.
2.16%
Microsoft Corp.
2.11%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
2.09%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.87%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.68%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.59%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.58%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.56%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.50%
Chevron Corp.
1.37%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.23%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.04%
Walmart, Inc.
1.04%
Johnson & Johnson
0.99%
PRF
Apple, Inc.
4.06%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.53%
Intel Corp.
2.57%
Microsoft Corp.
2.15%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.04%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.81%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
1.66%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.63%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.40%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.38%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.24%
Bank of America Corp.
1.20%
Chevron Corp.
1.15%
Johnson & Johnson
1.14%
Citigroup, Inc.
0.98%
Frequently asked questions about FNDB and PRF
How have the FNDB and PRF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, FNDB is up 17.3% year-to-date (YTD), while PRF has returned 17.22%. That puts FNDB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNDB or PRF?
Year-to-date, the FNDB ETF saw +$187M in flows, compared to -$201M for PRF.
Which ETF is more volatile: FNDB or PRF?
Over the past year, FNDB had a volatility of 10.86%, while PRF experienced 10.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: FNDB or PRF?
As of July 27, 2026, FNDB holds $1.42 B in assets under management (AUM), while PRF manages $9.77 B.
What sectors do the FNDB and PRF ETFs invest in?
FNDB leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, PRF focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FNDB ETF and PRF ETF?
FNDB top holdings include Apple, Inc., Intel Corp. and Microsoft Corp.. PRF holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc. and Intel Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FNDB or PRF?
FNDB holds 1412 securities with 26.11% of its assets in the top 15. PRF has 999 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.92%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
