FNDBvsIWDETF Comparison
VS
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) belongs to the US All Cap segment. iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. FNDB's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, IWD's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. FNDB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.18% for IWD. FNDB is up 20.96% year-to-date (YTD) with +$234M in YTD flows. IWD performs better with 24.27% YTD performance, and -$2.52B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNDB and IWD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FNDB vs IWD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FNDB IWD | +2.88%+3.45% | +2.44%+3.00% | +20.96%+24.27% | +23.14%+27.45% | +88.76%+88.06% | +85.07%+72.64% |
| Flows | FNDB IWD | +$40K-$1.45B | +$47M-$1.31B | +$234M-$2.52B | +$241M+$378M | +$434M+$305M | +$606M-$3.79B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FNDB IWD | +7.98%+8.33% | +10.27%+11.09% | +13.28%+12.91% | +15.30%+14.74% |
| Max drawdown | FNDB IWD | -3.80%-4.09% | -6.34%-6.81% | -16.85%-15.64% | -19.24%-19.11% |
| Max drawdown duration | FNDB IWD | 66d48d | 63d43d | 213d213d | 546d700d |
Trading data
FNDB | IWD | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.78 | $258.72 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $31.72 | $258.51 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FNDB | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FNDB | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.78 | $258.72 |
| 1D performance | +0.19% | +0.08% |
| AuM | $1.50 B | $82.93 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.18% |
Characteristics
FNDB | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index | Russell 1000 Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 1412 | 856 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 15, 2013 | May 22, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FNDB
USA
97.64%
Other
2.36%
IWD
USA
96.52%
Other
3.48%
Sectors
FNDB
Technology
22.57%
Finance
17.6%
Healthcare
12.6%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.38%
Energy
10.09%
Industrials
7.63%
Other
19.13%
IWD
Finance
22.2%
Technology
20.02%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
14.11%
Healthcare
12.69%
Industrials
9.04%
Other
21.95%
Advertisement
Diversification
FNDB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
26.07%
IWD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.59%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FNDB
Apple, Inc.
4.32%
Microsoft Corp.
2.68%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.34%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.80%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.56%
Chevron Corp.
1.52%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.44%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.41%
Intel Corp.
1.37%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.19%
Johnson & Johnson
1.07%
Bank of America Corp.
1.01%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
0.98%
IWD
Amazon.com, Inc.
6.13%
Apple, Inc.
5.57%
Microsoft Corp.
5.00%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.53%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
2.49%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.78%
Johnson & Johnson
1.70%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.16%
Walmart, Inc.
1.12%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.11%
Intel Corp.
1.08%
Chevron Corp.
1.01%
Bank of America Corp.
1.01%
Merck & Co., Inc.
0.97%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
0.93%
Frequently asked questions about FNDB and IWD
How have the FNDB and IWD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 28, 2026, FNDB is up 20.96% year-to-date (YTD), while IWD has returned 24.27%. That puts IWD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNDB or IWD?
Year-to-date, the FNDB ETF saw +$234M in flows, compared to -$2.52B for IWD.
Which ETF is more volatile: FNDB or IWD?
Over the past year, FNDB had a volatility of 10.27%, while IWD experienced 11.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: FNDB or IWD?
As of October 28, 2026, FNDB holds $1.50 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWD manages $82.93 B.
What sectors do the FNDB and IWD ETFs invest in?
FNDB leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, IWD focuses on Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the FNDB ETF and IWD ETF?
FNDB top holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.. IWD holds in its top three: Amazon.com, Inc., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FNDB or IWD?
FNDB holds 1413 securities with 26.07% of its assets in the top 15. IWD has 866 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.59%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FNDB & IWD
Advertisement
