Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FMATvsPSCMETF Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) belong to the same industry segment: US Materials. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Materials. FMAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.08%, versus 0.29% for PSCM. FMAT is up 9.21% year-to-date (YTD) with +$33M in YTD flows. PSCM performs better with 11.12% YTD performance, and +$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FMAT and PSCM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FMAT vs PSCM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FMAT PSCM | -6.93%-8.99% | +9.73%+10.88% | +9.21%+11.12% | +22.10%+38.83% | +39.42%+47.96% | +43.70%+45.09% |
| Flows | FMAT PSCM | +$6M+$5M | +$43M+$7M | +$33M+$7M | -$79M+$3M | -$38M-$6M | +$78M-$4M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FMAT PSCM | +19.13%+21.89% | +21.01%+28.19% | +17.57%+24.67% | +19.54%+25.71% |
| Max drawdown | FMAT PSCM | -7.30%-10.55% | -14.66%-19.90% | -23.21%-35.30% | -25.40%-35.30% |
| Max drawdown duration | FMAT PSCM | 10d29d | 57d79d | 430d380d | 679d380d |
FMAT | PSCM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 2:23 PM | $57.24 | $93.83 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $57.60 | $94.33 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FMAT | PSCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FMAT | PSCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $57.24 | $93.83 |
| 1D performance | -0.62% | -0.53% |
| AuM | $530.70 M | $18.69 M |
| E/R | 0.08% | 0.29% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FMAT and PSCM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FMAT is up 9.21% year-to-date (YTD), while PSCM has returned 11.12%. That puts PSCM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FMAT or PSCM?
Year-to-date, the FMAT ETF saw +$33M in flows, compared to +$7M for PSCM.
Which ETF is more volatile: FMAT or PSCM?
Over the past year, FMAT had a volatility of 21.01%, while PSCM experienced 28.19%.
Which ETF is bigger: FMAT or PSCM?
As of March 11, 2026, FMAT holds $530.70 M in assets under management (AUM), while PSCM manages $18.69 M.
What sectors do the FMAT and PSCM ETFs invest in?
FMAT leans toward sectors like Materials. Meanwhile, PSCM focuses on Materials.
What are the top holdings of the FMAT ETF and PSCM ETF?
FMAT top holdings include IE000S9YS762, NEWMONT CORP and FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. PSCM holds in its top three: US83443Q1031, EASTMAN CHEMICAL and ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: FMAT or PSCM?
FMAT holds 105 securities with 65.23% of its assets in the top 15. PSCM has 27 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.25%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
