FLRTvsSCHZETF Comparison
ETF 1
FLRT
Pacer Pacific Asset Floating Rate High Income ETF
This fund is part of
US Aggregate Bonds
-0.16%
VS
Pacer Pacific Asset Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) belong to the same industry segment: US Aggregate Bonds. In contrast, SCHZ's top sector exposures are Sovereign, Industrials and Government Agencies. FLRT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.03% for SCHZ. FLRT is up 2.92% year-to-date (YTD) with +$481M in YTD flows. SCHZ performs worse with -0.98% YTD performance, and +$1.70B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLRT and SCHZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLRT vs SCHZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLRT SCHZ | -0.55%+0.93% | +0.71%-0.40% | +2.92%-0.98% | +4.55%-1.12% | +24.35%+16.47% | +33.76%-1.04% |
| Flows | FLRT SCHZ | +$277M+$160M | +$409M+$432M | +$481M+$1.70B | +$508M+$2.08B | +$914M+$3.96B | +$1.04B+$3.18B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLRT SCHZ | +0.76%+4.67% | +1.15%+3.95% | +1.16%+4.96% | +1.93%+5.99% |
| Max drawdown | FLRT SCHZ | -0.64%-3.29% | -1.83%-4.68% | -2.05%-4.88% | -7.39%-17.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLRT SCHZ | 31d59d | 93d236d | 72d284d | 377d1556d |
Trading data
FLRT | SCHZ | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.15 | $22.42 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $46.20 | $22.46 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLRT
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFLRT | SCHZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLRT | SCHZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.15 | $22.42 |
| 1D performance | -0.11% | -0.18% |
| AuM | $1.06 B | $10.78 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
FLRT | SCHZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index |
| N° of holdings | - | 577 |
| Asset class | - | Bonds |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 18, 2015 | July 14, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLRT
Data will be available soon
SCHZ
USA
83.82%
Other
16.18%
Sectors
FLRT
Data will be available soon
SCHZ
Sovereign
72.98%
Industrials
10.09%
Other
16.93%
Diversification
FLRT
Data will be available soon
SCHZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.98%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
FLRT
Data will be available soon
SCHZ
USA, Notes 4.375% 15may2036, USD (C-2036)
0.73%
USA, Notes 4.125% 15feb2036, USD (B-2036)
0.64%
USA, Notes 4.625% 15feb2035, USD (B-2035)
0.63%
USA, Notes 4.375% 15may2034, USD (C-2034)
0.62%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15nov2034, USD (F-2034)
0.62%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15may2035, USD (C-2035)
0.61%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15aug2035, USD (E-2035)
0.61%
USA, Notes 4% 15feb2034, USD (B-2034)
0.61%
USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2034, USD (E-2034)
0.60%
USA, Notes 4% 15nov2035, USD (F-2035)
0.60%
USA, Notes 4.5% 15nov2033, USD (F-2033)
0.59%
USA, Notes 3.5% 31jan2028, USD (U-2028)
0.55%
USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2033, USD (E-2033)
0.54%
USA, Notes 4% 28feb2030, USD (H-2030)
0.51%
USA, Notes 1.25% 15aug2031, USD (E-2031)
0.51%
Frequently asked questions about FLRT and SCHZ
How have the FLRT and SCHZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, FLRT is up 2.92% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHZ has lost -0.98%. That puts FLRT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLRT or SCHZ?
Year-to-date, the FLRT ETF saw +$481M in flows, compared to +$1.70B for SCHZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLRT or SCHZ?
Over the past year, FLRT had a volatility of 1.15%, while SCHZ experienced 3.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLRT or SCHZ?
As of October 23, 2026, FLRT holds $1.06 B in assets under management (AUM), while SCHZ manages $10.78 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about FLRT & SCHZ
Navigating the Changing Equity Risk Premium Landscape: What Investors Need to Know
September 21, 2023
FLRT
Schwab Launches New High-Yield Bond ETF on NYSE ARCA
July 13, 2023
SCHZ
Advertisement
Advertisement
