Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FLRGvsRECSETF Comparison
Fidelity US Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. FLRG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, RECS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Both FLRG and RECS have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%. FLRG is down -0.19% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with -1.35% YTD performance, and +$271M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLRG and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FLRG vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLRG RECS | -1.86%-3.13% | -0.83%-0.98% | -0.19%-1.35% | +15.97%+22.37% | +67.60%+79.91% | +84.66%+99.42% |
| Flows | FLRG RECS | -$2M+$185M | +$88K+$488M | -$2M+$271M | +$35M+$2.27B | +$195M+$4.22B | +$210M+$4.19B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLRG RECS | +10.35%+11.79% | +15.93%+18.03% | +13.46%+14.51% | +15.26%+16.56% |
| Max drawdown | FLRG RECS | -3.14%-3.59% | -11.50%-13.84% | -16.74%-18.49% | -20.04%-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLRG RECS | 41d28d | 38d45d | 154d126d | 604d573d |
FLRG | RECS | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.85 | $40.10 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $37.88 | $40.11 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FLRG | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FLRG | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.85 | $40.10 |
| 1D performance | -0.06% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $269.06 M | $4.97 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.15% |
FLRG | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Fidelity | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 101 | 331 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 15, 2020 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FLRG and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FLRG is down -0.19% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has lost -1.35%. That puts FLRG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLRG or RECS?
Year-to-date, the FLRG ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to +$271M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLRG or RECS?
Over the past year, FLRG had a volatility of 15.93%, while RECS experienced 18.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLRG or RECS?
As of March 10, 2026, FLRG holds $269.06 M in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $4.97 B.
What sectors do the FLRG and RECS ETFs invest in?
FLRG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FLRG ETF and RECS ETF?
FLRG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FLRG or RECS?
FLRG holds 101 securities with 44.11% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 336 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.28%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
