FLQSvsSCDSETF Comparison
VS
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) is part of the US Small Cap segment. FLQS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, SCDS's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. FLQS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.4% for SCDS. FLQS is up 14.47% year-to-date (YTD) with -$28M in YTD flows. SCDS performs better with 22.53% YTD performance, and +$752K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLQS and SCDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLQS vs SCDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLQS SCDS | +4.04%+1.64% | -1.81%-2.82% | +14.47%+22.53% | +13.43%+23.22% | +56.63%n/a | +32.89%n/a |
| Flows | FLQS SCDS | +$2M- | -$3M+$759K | -$28M+$752K | -$28M+$155K | +$642K- | +$18M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLQS SCDS | +10.41%+12.70% | +13.72%+17.08% | +17.71%n/a | +19.06%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FLQS SCDS | -7.72%-9.60% | -8.39%-9.60% | -22.82%n/a | -28.18%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FLQS SCDS | 73d73d | 49d73d | 415dn/a | 862dn/a |
Trading data
FLQS | SCDS | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.60 | $73.57 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $48.84 | $72.94 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFLQS | SCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLQS | SCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.60 | $73.57 |
| 1D performance | +1.56% | +0.87% |
| AuM | $48.87 M | $9.49 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
FLQS | SCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | LibertyQ US Small Cap Equity Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 487 | 273 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 26, 2017 | August 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
FLQS
USA
92.87%
Other
7.13%
SCDS
USA
94.83%
Other
5.17%
Sectors
FLQS
Finance
21.11%
Technology
14.18%
Healthcare
13.87%
Consumer Cyclical.
10.31%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.5%
Industrials
8.91%
Other
22.12%
SCDS
Finance
25.7%
Healthcare
18.63%
Technology
14.36%
Industrials
9.76%
Other
31.55%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLQS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.84%
SCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.14%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FLQS
Alkermes Plc
1.06%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
1.03%
Essent Group Ltd.
1.02%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
1.01%
InterDigital, Inc.
0.98%
Moog, Inc.
0.97%
Cheesecake Factory, Inc.
0.92%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.91%
Qualys, Inc.
0.91%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.89%
ESCO Technologies, Inc.
0.89%
Compass, Inc. (New York)
0.85%
Commvault Systems, Inc.
0.81%
Selective Insurance Group, Inc.
0.79%
Enova International, Inc.
0.78%
SCDS
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
1.12%
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
1.06%
Twist Bioscience Corp.
1.05%
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
0.95%
Moog, Inc.
0.94%
WSFS Financial Corp.
0.93%
Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
0.90%
AZZ, Inc.
0.88%
Enova International, Inc.
0.79%
First Financial Bancorp (Ohio)
0.77%
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
0.76%
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
0.76%
SM Energy Co.
0.75%
Perimeter Solutions, Inc.
0.74%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
0.73%
Frequently asked questions about FLQS and SCDS
How have the FLQS and SCDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 28, 2026, FLQS is up 14.47% year-to-date (YTD), while SCDS has returned 22.53%. That puts SCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLQS or SCDS?
Year-to-date, the FLQS ETF saw -$28M in flows, compared to +$752K for SCDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLQS or SCDS?
Over the past year, FLQS had a volatility of 13.72%, while SCDS experienced 17.08%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLQS or SCDS?
As of October 28, 2026, FLQS holds $48.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCDS manages $9.49 M.
What sectors do the FLQS and SCDS ETFs invest in?
FLQS leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, SCDS focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FLQS ETF and SCDS ETF?
FLQS top holdings include Alkermes Plc, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Essent Group Ltd.. SCDS holds in its top three: The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc., Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. and Twist Bioscience Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLQS or SCDS?
FLQS holds 490 securities with 13.84% of its assets in the top 15. SCDS has 273 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.14%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
