FLQSvsRESMETF Comparison
VS
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQS) and Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. FLQS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, RESM's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. FLQS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.32% for RESM. FLQS is up 15% year-to-date (YTD) with -$28M in YTD flows. RESM performs better with 17.24% YTD performance, and +$397K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLQS and RESM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLQS vs RESM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLQS RESM | +4.52%+1.12% | -0.24%-2.99% | +15.00%+17.24% | +13.19%n/a | +57.07%n/a | +33.71%n/a |
| Flows | FLQS RESM | +$2M- | -$3M+$2M | -$28M+$397K | -$28M- | +$642K- | +$18M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLQS RESM | +10.72%+12.22% | +13.76%n/a | +17.71%n/a | +19.09%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FLQS RESM | -7.72%-9.03% | -8.39%n/a | -22.82%n/a | -28.18%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FLQS RESM | 71d71d | 49dn/a | 415dn/a | 862dn/a |
Trading data
FLQS | RESM | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.99 | $23.50 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $49.12 | $23.32 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RESM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFLQS | RESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLQS | RESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.99 | $23.50 |
| 1D performance | -0.26% | +0.76% |
| AuM | $49.10 M | $5.83 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
FLQS | RESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | LibertyQ US Small Cap Equity Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 487 | 1013 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 26, 2017 | December 11, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLQS
USA
92.87%
Other
7.13%
RESM
USA
93.96%
Other
6.04%
Sectors
FLQS
Finance
21.11%
Technology
14.18%
Healthcare
13.87%
Consumer Cyclical.
10.31%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.5%
Industrials
8.91%
Other
22.12%
RESM
Finance
24.46%
Healthcare
20.2%
Technology
13.36%
Industrials
10.11%
Other
31.87%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLQS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.84%
RESM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.79%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FLQS
Alkermes Plc
1.06%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
1.03%
Essent Group Ltd.
1.02%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
1.01%
InterDigital, Inc.
0.98%
Moog, Inc.
0.97%
Cheesecake Factory, Inc.
0.92%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.91%
Qualys, Inc.
0.91%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.89%
ESCO Technologies, Inc.
0.89%
Compass, Inc. (New York)
0.85%
Commvault Systems, Inc.
0.81%
Selective Insurance Group, Inc.
0.79%
Enova International, Inc.
0.78%
RESM
JFrog Ltd.
0.58%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.52%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.50%
Moog, Inc.
0.49%
Glaukos Corp.
0.48%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.46%
Columbia Short Term Cash Fund
0.46%
InterDigital, Inc.
0.45%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.45%
Old National Bancorp
0.44%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.43%
Brinker International, Inc.
0.40%
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
0.39%
Silicon Laboratories, Inc.
0.37%
StoneX Group, Inc.
0.37%
Frequently asked questions about FLQS and RESM
How have the FLQS and RESM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, FLQS is up 15% year-to-date (YTD), while RESM has returned 17.24%. That puts RESM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLQS or RESM?
Year-to-date, the FLQS ETF saw -$28M in flows, compared to +$397K for RESM.
Which ETF is bigger: FLQS or RESM?
As of October 26, 2026, FLQS holds $49.10 M in assets under management (AUM), while RESM manages $5.83 M.
What sectors do the FLQS and RESM ETFs invest in?
FLQS leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, RESM focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FLQS ETF and RESM ETF?
FLQS top holdings include Alkermes Plc, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Essent Group Ltd.. RESM holds in its top three: JFrog Ltd., UMB Financial Corp. and ViaSat, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLQS or RESM?
FLQS holds 490 securities with 13.84% of its assets in the top 15. RESM has 1016 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.79%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
