FLQSvsIWMWETF Comparison
VS
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) is part of the Options Strategies segment. FLQS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, IWMW's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. FLQS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.39% for IWMW. FLQS is up 13.02% year-to-date (YTD) with -$30M in YTD flows. IWMW performs better with 13.7% YTD performance, and +$24M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLQS and IWMW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLQS vs IWMW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLQS IWMW | -3.41%-2.56% | +2.96%+4.23% | +13.02%+13.70% | +9.65%+16.20% | +43.55%n/a | +35.09%n/a |
| Flows | FLQS IWMW | -$5M-$821K | -$5M+$7M | -$30M+$24M | -$28M+$33M | +$3M- | +$14M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLQS IWMW | +11.93%+9.84% | +14.23%+12.34% | +17.87%n/a | +19.17%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FLQS IWMW | -4.90%-3.79% | -9.09%-6.92% | -22.82%n/a | -28.18%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FLQS IWMW | 26d26d | 112d62d | 415dn/a | 862dn/a |
Trading data
FLQS | IWMW | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.42 | $38.48 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $48.19 | $38.52 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLQS | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLQS | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.42 | $38.48 |
| 1D performance | +0.49% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $46.03 M | $58.07 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
FLQS | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | iShares |
| Benchmark | LibertyQ US Small Cap Equity Index | Cboe FTSE Russell IWM 2% OTM BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 487 | 1945 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 26, 2017 | March 14, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLQS
USA
92.7%
Other
7.3%
IWMW
USA
96.06%
Other
3.94%
Sectors
FLQS
Finance
21.5%
Technology
14.07%
Healthcare
13.37%
Consumer Cyclical.
10.5%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.65%
Industrials
9.11%
Other
21.8%
IWMW
Finance
26.88%
Healthcare
20.29%
Technology
11.87%
Industrials
10.58%
Other
30.37%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLQS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.56%
IWMW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.1%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FLQS
Alkermes Plc
1.15%
Moog, Inc.
1.07%
ESCO Technologies, Inc.
1.03%
Essent Group Ltd.
0.99%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.97%
Commvault Systems, Inc.
0.91%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
0.91%
Compass, Inc. (New York)
0.89%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.87%
Enova International, Inc.
0.84%
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
0.82%
Selective Insurance Group, Inc.
0.80%
Clear Secure, Inc.
0.79%
Home Bancshares, Inc. (Arkansas)
0.77%
Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
0.77%
IWMW
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
0.61%
Moog, Inc.
0.39%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.38%
Hut 8 Corp.
0.36%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.35%
Cytokinetics, Inc.
0.34%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.32%
Glaukos Corp.
0.31%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.31%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.30%
Old National Bancorp
0.30%
Brinker International, Inc.
0.29%
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.28%
HealthEquity, Inc.
0.28%
JFrog Ltd.
0.28%
Frequently asked questions about FLQS and IWMW
How have the FLQS and IWMW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, FLQS is up 13.02% year-to-date (YTD), while IWMW has returned 13.7%. That puts IWMW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLQS or IWMW?
Year-to-date, the FLQS ETF saw -$30M in flows, compared to +$24M for IWMW.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLQS or IWMW?
Over the past year, FLQS had a volatility of 14.23%, while IWMW experienced 12.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLQS or IWMW?
As of September 11, 2026, FLQS holds $46.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWMW manages $58.07 M.
What sectors do the FLQS and IWMW ETFs invest in?
FLQS leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, IWMW focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FLQS ETF and IWMW ETF?
FLQS top holdings include Alkermes Plc, Moog, Inc. and ESCO Technologies, Inc.. IWMW holds in its top three: BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury, Moog, Inc. and BrightSpring Health Services, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLQS or IWMW?
FLQS holds 490 securities with 13.56% of its assets in the top 15. IWMW has 1957 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.1%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
