FLQMvsMCDSETF Comparison
VS
Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. FLQM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, MCDS's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. FLQM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.35% for MCDS. FLQM is up 11.01% year-to-date (YTD) with -$419M in YTD flows. MCDS performs better with 15.79% YTD performance, and +$38K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLQM and MCDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLQM vs MCDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLQM MCDS | +6.18%+1.39% | +2.46%-1.14% | +11.01%+15.79% | +14.71%+17.96% | +49.67%n/a | +41.18%n/a |
| Flows | FLQM MCDS | -$54M-$1M | -$159M+$43K | -$419M+$38K | -$445M+$38K | +$854M- | +$1.10B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLQM MCDS | +11.45%+10.76% | +12.37%+12.95% | +14.38%n/a | +16.45%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FLQM MCDS | -7.14%-7.51% | -7.59%-7.51% | -19.74%n/a | -22.41%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FLQM MCDS | 58d79d | 137d79d | 406dn/a | 714dn/a |
Trading data
FLQM | MCDS | |
Last sale 11/4/2026 at 3:01 PM | $62.78 | $67.30 |
| Previous close 11/03/2026 | $61.78 | $67.35 |
| Consolidated volume 11/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFLQM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/4/2026 at 3:01 PM
Live
Closed
FLQM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $62.78 | $67.30 |
| 1D performance | +1.62% | -0.07% |
| AuM | $1.46 B | $8.08 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
FLQM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | LibertyQ US Mid Cap Equity Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 201 | 203 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 26, 2017 | August 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
FLQM
USA
94.95%
Other
5.05%
MCDS
USA
96.83%
Other
3.17%
Sectors
FLQM
Finance
19.1%
Healthcare
16.3%
Industrials
14.07%
Technology
13.74%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.41%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.52%
Other
18.86%
MCDS
Finance
20.88%
Technology
18.32%
Industrials
15.58%
Healthcare
11.98%
Other
33.25%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLQM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.68%
MCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.37%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
FLQM
Garmin Ltd.
1.25%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
1.18%
Expedia Group, Inc.
1.16%
NetApp, Inc.
1.14%
Cencora, Inc.
1.13%
Fastenal Co.
1.13%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.13%
Waters Corp.
1.12%
The Allstate Corp.
1.10%
Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.
1.09%
HP, Inc.
1.08%
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
1.05%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.05%
Devon Energy Corp.
1.05%
Dollar General Corp.
1.04%
MCDS
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.79%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
1.56%
Natera, Inc.
1.42%
State Street Corp.
1.22%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
1.20%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.20%
Snowflake, Inc.
1.15%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.13%
M&T Bank Corp.
1.01%
Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
0.98%
AMETEK, Inc.
0.97%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
0.96%
Dover Corp.
0.95%
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
0.93%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
0.90%
Frequently asked questions about FLQM and MCDS
How have the FLQM and MCDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 3, 2026, FLQM is up 11.01% year-to-date (YTD), while MCDS has returned 15.79%. That puts MCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLQM or MCDS?
Year-to-date, the FLQM ETF saw -$419M in flows, compared to +$38K for MCDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLQM or MCDS?
Over the past year, FLQM had a volatility of 12.37%, while MCDS experienced 12.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLQM or MCDS?
As of November 3, 2026, FLQM holds $1.46 B in assets under management (AUM), while MCDS manages $8.08 M.
What sectors do the FLQM and MCDS ETFs invest in?
FLQM leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, MCDS focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FLQM ETF and MCDS ETF?
FLQM top holdings include Garmin Ltd., Prudential Financial, Inc. and Expedia Group, Inc.. MCDS holds in its top three: Marathon Petroleum Corp., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. and Natera, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLQM or MCDS?
FLQM holds 204 securities with 16.68% of its assets in the top 15. MCDS has 203 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.37%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
