FLQMvsMCDSETF Comparison
VS
Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. FLQM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, MCDS's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. FLQM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.35% for MCDS. FLQM is up 6.12% year-to-date (YTD) with -$330M in YTD flows. MCDS performs better with 12.47% YTD performance, and +$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLQM and MCDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLQM vs MCDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLQM MCDS | -2.88%-6.40% | +3.02%-2.03% | +6.12%+12.47% | +6.31%+14.64% | +41.09%n/a | +38.81%n/a |
| Flows | FLQM MCDS | -$30M+$1M | -$106M+$1M | -$330M+$1M | -$311M+$1M | +$960M- | +$1.19B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLQM MCDS | +13.24%+10.63% | +12.29%+13.17% | +14.54%n/a | +16.46%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FLQM MCDS | -4.67%-6.90% | -7.59%-7.49% | -19.74%n/a | -22.41%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FLQM MCDS | 23d31d | 137d46d | 406dn/a | 714dn/a |
Trading data
FLQM | MCDS | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $59.42 | $66.01 |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $59.22 | $65.59 |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFLQM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLQM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $59.42 | $66.01 |
| 1D performance | +0.34% | +0.65% |
| AuM | $1.49 B | $9.18 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
FLQM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | LibertyQ US Mid Cap Equity Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 202 | 202 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 26, 2017 | August 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLQM
USA
95.1%
Other
4.9%
MCDS
USA
96.81%
Other
3.19%
Sectors
FLQM
Finance
19.73%
Healthcare
15.26%
Industrials
14.53%
Technology
13.16%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.5%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.84%
Other
18.98%
MCDS
Finance
21.87%
Industrials
16.39%
Technology
16.05%
Healthcare
10.7%
Other
34.99%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLQM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.37%
MCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
15.97%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FLQM
The Allstate Corp.
1.21%
Expedia Group, Inc.
1.17%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
1.15%
Paychex, Inc.
1.12%
Cincinnati Financial Corp.
1.12%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.11%
Cencora, Inc.
1.10%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.10%
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
1.08%
Kenvue, Inc.
1.07%
Sysco Corp.
1.06%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
1.05%
Fastenal Co.
1.02%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
1.00%
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
1.00%
MCDS
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.39%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
1.23%
State Street Corp.
1.21%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
1.17%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.15%
M&T Bank Corp.
1.11%
Dover Corp.
0.99%
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
0.99%
Loews Corp.
0.98%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.98%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
0.97%
Performance Food Group Co.
0.96%
CMS Energy Corp.
0.96%
Entergy Corp.
0.96%
Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
0.94%
Frequently asked questions about FLQM and MCDS
How have the FLQM and MCDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 16, 2026, FLQM is up 6.12% year-to-date (YTD), while MCDS has returned 12.47%. That puts MCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLQM or MCDS?
Year-to-date, the FLQM ETF saw -$330M in flows, compared to +$1M for MCDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLQM or MCDS?
Over the past year, FLQM had a volatility of 12.29%, while MCDS experienced 13.17%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLQM or MCDS?
As of September 16, 2026, FLQM holds $1.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while MCDS manages $9.18 M.
What sectors do the FLQM and MCDS ETFs invest in?
FLQM leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, MCDS focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FLQM ETF and MCDS ETF?
FLQM top holdings include The Allstate Corp., Expedia Group, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc.. MCDS holds in its top three: Marathon Petroleum Corp., Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. and State Street Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLQM or MCDS?
FLQM holds 205 securities with 16.37% of its assets in the top 15. MCDS has 202 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.97%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
