FLQMvsIWSETF Comparison
VS
Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is part of the US Mid Cap Value segment. FLQM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, IWS's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. FLQM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.23% for IWS. FLQM is up 14.06% year-to-date (YTD) with -$423M in YTD flows. IWS performs better with 22.16% YTD performance, and -$2.23B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLQM and IWS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLQM vs IWS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLQM IWS | +9.10%+4.11% | +3.93%+1.47% | +14.06%+22.16% | +17.93%+25.39% | +54.65%+71.87% | +44.42%+52.37% |
| Flows | FLQM IWS | -$58M-$838M | -$162M-$946M | -$423M-$2.23B | -$454M-$1.95B | +$850M-$3.61B | +$1.09B-$4.68B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLQM IWS | +12.40%+10.54% | +12.66%+13.00% | +14.46%+15.08% | +16.49%+17.21% |
| Max drawdown | FLQM IWS | -7.14%-6.99% | -7.59%-7.51% | -19.74%-20.45% | -22.41%-21.32% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLQM IWS | 58d79d | 137d44d | 406d269d | 714d785d |
Trading data
FLQM | IWS | |
Last sale 11/5/2026 at 6:24 PM | $62.15 | $168.66 |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $63.47 | $173.49 |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLQM | IWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/5/2026 at 6:24 PM
Live
Closed
FLQM | IWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $62.15 | $168.66 |
| 1D performance | -2.08% | -2.78% |
| AuM | $1.49 B | $14.93 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.23% |
Characteristics
FLQM | IWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | iShares |
| Benchmark | LibertyQ US Mid Cap Equity Index | Russell Midcap Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 201 | 710 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 26, 2017 | July 17, 2001 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLQM
USA
94.95%
Other
5.05%
IWS
USA
95.33%
Other
4.67%
Sectors
FLQM
Finance
19.1%
Healthcare
16.3%
Industrials
14.07%
Technology
13.74%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.41%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.52%
Other
18.86%
IWS
Finance
25.08%
Industrials
13.04%
Healthcare
11.82%
Technology
11.32%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.79%
Other
30.94%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLQM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.68%
IWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.46%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
FLQM
Garmin Ltd.
1.25%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
1.18%
Expedia Group, Inc.
1.16%
NetApp, Inc.
1.14%
Cencora, Inc.
1.13%
Fastenal Co.
1.13%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.13%
Waters Corp.
1.12%
The Allstate Corp.
1.10%
Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.
1.09%
HP, Inc.
1.08%
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
1.05%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.05%
Devon Energy Corp.
1.05%
Dollar General Corp.
1.04%
IWS
Phillips 66
0.97%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.86%
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
0.75%
Moderna, Inc.
0.71%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
0.66%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
0.59%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
0.58%
AMETEK, Inc.
0.57%
The Allstate Corp.
0.57%
Baker Hughes Co.
0.55%
US30609A1097
0.54%
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.53%
Corteva, Inc.
0.53%
Devon Energy Corp.
0.53%
Nucor Corp.
0.52%
Frequently asked questions about FLQM and IWS
How have the FLQM and IWS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 4, 2026, FLQM is up 14.06% year-to-date (YTD), while IWS has returned 22.16%. That puts IWS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLQM or IWS?
Year-to-date, the FLQM ETF saw -$423M in flows, compared to -$2.23B for IWS.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLQM or IWS?
Over the past year, FLQM had a volatility of 12.66%, while IWS experienced 13%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLQM or IWS?
As of November 4, 2026, FLQM holds $1.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWS manages $14.93 B.
What sectors do the FLQM and IWS ETFs invest in?
FLQM leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWS focuses on Finance, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FLQM ETF and IWS ETF?
FLQM top holdings include Garmin Ltd., Prudential Financial, Inc. and Expedia Group, Inc.. IWS holds in its top three: Phillips 66, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLQM or IWS?
FLQM holds 204 securities with 16.68% of its assets in the top 15. IWS has 719 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.46%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
