FLQMvsIWRETF Comparison
VS
Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. FLQM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, IWR's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. FLQM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.18% for IWR. FLQM is up 11.73% year-to-date (YTD) with -$410M in YTD flows. IWR performs better with 15.56% YTD performance, and +$4.70B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLQM and IWR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLQM vs IWR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLQM IWR | +7.31%+1.89% | +3.12%-0.35% | +11.73%+15.56% | +15.45%+16.91% | +53.20%+69.67% | +42.89%+41.11% |
| Flows | FLQM IWR | -$51M+$1.28B | -$150M+$1.87B | -$410M+$4.70B | -$436M+$5.88B | +$863M+$12.19B | +$1.11B+$14.03B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLQM IWR | +11.45%+11.42% | +12.37%+13.49% | +14.40%+15.70% | +16.45%+18.23% |
| Max drawdown | FLQM IWR | -7.14%-6.83% | -7.59%-8.16% | -19.74%-21.08% | -22.41%-26.20% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLQM IWR | 58d78d | 137d49d | 406d239d | 714d854d |
Trading data
FLQM | IWR | |
Last sale 11/3/2026 at 7:15 PM | $61.97 | $110.37 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $62.12 | $110.32 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLQM | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/3/2026 at 7:15 PM
Live
Closed
FLQM | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.97 | $110.37 |
| 1D performance | -0.24% | +0.05% |
| AuM | $1.48 B | $58.17 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.18% |
Characteristics
FLQM | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | iShares |
| Benchmark | LibertyQ US Mid Cap Equity Index | Russell Midcap Index |
| N° of holdings | 201 | 813 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 26, 2017 | July 17, 2001 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLQM
USA
94.95%
Other
5.05%
IWR
USA
95.79%
Other
4.21%
Sectors
FLQM
Finance
19.1%
Healthcare
16.3%
Industrials
14.07%
Technology
13.74%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.41%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.52%
Other
18.86%
IWR
Finance
20.74%
Technology
17.64%
Industrials
13.87%
Healthcare
12.44%
Other
35.31%
Diversification
FLQM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.68%
IWR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.35%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
FLQM
Garmin Ltd.
1.25%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
1.18%
Expedia Group, Inc.
1.16%
NetApp, Inc.
1.14%
Cencora, Inc.
1.13%
Fastenal Co.
1.13%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.13%
Waters Corp.
1.12%
The Allstate Corp.
1.10%
Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.
1.09%
HP, Inc.
1.08%
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
1.05%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.05%
Devon Energy Corp.
1.05%
Dollar General Corp.
1.04%
IWR
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
0.87%
Snowflake, Inc.
0.85%
Cloudflare, Inc.
0.83%
Phillips 66
0.77%
Datadog, Inc.
0.68%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
0.65%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.64%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
0.56%
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
0.56%
Moderna, Inc.
0.53%
Royal Caribbean Group
0.50%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
0.49%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
0.48%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.47%
United Rentals, Inc.
0.47%
Frequently asked questions about FLQM and IWR
How have the FLQM and IWR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, FLQM is up 11.73% year-to-date (YTD), while IWR has returned 15.56%. That puts IWR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLQM or IWR?
Year-to-date, the FLQM ETF saw -$410M in flows, compared to +$4.70B for IWR.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLQM or IWR?
Over the past year, FLQM had a volatility of 12.37%, while IWR experienced 13.49%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLQM or IWR?
As of November 2, 2026, FLQM holds $1.48 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWR manages $58.17 B.
What sectors do the FLQM and IWR ETFs invest in?
FLQM leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWR focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FLQM ETF and IWR ETF?
FLQM top holdings include Garmin Ltd., Prudential Financial, Inc. and Expedia Group, Inc.. IWR holds in its top three: Marathon Petroleum Corp., Snowflake, Inc. and Cloudflare, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLQM or IWR?
FLQM holds 204 securities with 16.68% of its assets in the top 15. IWR has 823 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.35%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
