FLQLvsLCTUETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQL) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. FLQL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.3% for LCTU. FLQL is up 13.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$206M in YTD flows. LCTU performs worse with 9.89% YTD performance, and -$321M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLQL and LCTU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLQL vs LCTU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLQL LCTU | -1.78%-2.56% | +1.53%+1.11% | +13.42%+9.89% | +16.93%+13.94% | +81.89%+71.37% | +92.51%+69.98% |
| Flows | FLQL LCTU | +$39M+$4M | +$72M-$271M | +$206M-$321M | +$243M-$308M | +$394M-$891M | +$87M-$796M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLQL LCTU | +13.44%+11.16% | +14.32%+12.99% | +15.79%+15.31% | +16.61%+17.41% |
| Max drawdown | FLQL LCTU | -4.50%-3.26% | -8.99%-9.37% | -19.27%-19.80% | -21.66%-25.94% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLQL LCTU | 34d34d | 47d93d | 124d127d | 688d744d |
Trading data
FLQL | LCTU | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 4:08 PM | $77.94 | $81.48 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $78.22 | $81.72 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LCTU
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFLQL | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 4:08 PM
Live
Closed
FLQL | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $77.94 | $81.48 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | -0.30% |
| AuM | $2.12 B | $1.22 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
FLQL | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | iShares |
| Benchmark | LibertyQ US Large Cap Equity Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 213 | 324 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 26, 2017 | April 8, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLQL
USA
99.66%
Other
0.34%
LCTU
USA
98.48%
Other
1.52%
Sectors
FLQL
Technology
45.8%
Finance
12.61%
Healthcare
10.83%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.11%
Industrials
8.06%
Other
14.58%
LCTU
Technology
43.01%
Finance
14.56%
Healthcare
9.06%
Industrials
8.45%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.36%
Other
16.55%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLQL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.02%
LCTU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.92%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FLQL
Apple, Inc.
8.24%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.79%
Microsoft Corp.
4.09%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.54%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.07%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.87%
Broadcom Inc.
2.57%
Johnson & Johnson
2.00%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.00%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.96%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.75%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.65%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.53%
Caterpillar, Inc.
1.49%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
1.47%
LCTU
Apple, Inc.
7.65%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.20%
Microsoft Corp.
4.09%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.82%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.60%
Broadcom Inc.
2.38%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.01%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.82%
Bank of America Corp.
1.63%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.38%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.30%
Tesla, Inc.
1.29%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.27%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.27%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.21%
Frequently asked questions about FLQL and LCTU
How have the FLQL and LCTU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, FLQL is up 13.42% year-to-date (YTD), while LCTU has returned 9.89%. That puts FLQL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLQL or LCTU?
Year-to-date, the FLQL ETF saw +$206M in flows, compared to -$321M for LCTU.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLQL or LCTU?
Over the past year, FLQL had a volatility of 14.32%, while LCTU experienced 12.99%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLQL or LCTU?
As of September 17, 2026, FLQL holds $2.12 B in assets under management (AUM), while LCTU manages $1.22 B.
What sectors do the FLQL and LCTU ETFs invest in?
FLQL leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, LCTU focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FLQL ETF and LCTU ETF?
FLQL top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp.. LCTU holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLQL or LCTU?
FLQL holds 214 securities with 45.02% of its assets in the top 15. LCTU has 325 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.92%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
