FLQLvsIWBETF Comparison
VS
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQL) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Both FLQL and IWB have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%. FLQL is up 13.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$159M in YTD flows. IWB performs worse with 11.52% YTD performance, and -$2.06B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLQL and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLQL vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLQL IWB | +0.39%+0.67% | +5.34%+5.89% | +13.02%+11.52% | +21.96%+20.76% | +80.21%+73.71% | +89.03%+77.58% |
| Flows | FLQL IWB | +$8M+$245M | +$52M+$284M | +$159M-$2.06B | +$152M-$1.17B | +$363M-$2.46B | +$4M-$2.16B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLQL IWB | +15.83%+13.71% | +14.12%+12.93% | +15.83%+15.27% | +16.57%+17.33% |
| Max drawdown | FLQL IWB | -4.50%-4.33% | -8.99%-8.86% | -19.27%-19.16% | -21.66%-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLQL IWB | 34d59d | 47d76d | 124d126d | 688d709d |
Trading data
FLQL | IWB | |
Last sale 8/4/2026 at 3:22 PM | $79.07 | $420.01 |
| Previous close 08/03/2026 | $77.95 | $414.59 |
| Consolidated volume 08/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLQL | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/4/2026 at 3:22 PM
Live
Closed
FLQL | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $79.07 | $420.01 |
| 1D performance | +1.43% | +1.31% |
| AuM | $2.07 B | $49.02 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
FLQL | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | iShares |
| Benchmark | LibertyQ US Large Cap Equity Index | Russell 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 213 | 1006 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 26, 2017 | May 15, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLQL
USA
99.68%
Other
0.32%
IWB
USA
97.26%
Other
2.74%
Sectors
FLQL
Technology
45.96%
Finance
12.28%
Healthcare
10.54%
Industrials
8.45%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.96%
Other
14.82%
IWB
Technology
43.33%
Finance
13.78%
Healthcare
8.9%
Industrials
8.8%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.46%
Other
16.73%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLQL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.13%
IWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.67%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
FLQL
Apple, Inc.
6.95%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.67%
Microsoft Corp.
3.93%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.66%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.09%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.95%
Broadcom Inc.
2.46%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.01%
Johnson & Johnson
1.92%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.82%
Lam Research Corp.
1.78%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
1.77%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.73%
Caterpillar, Inc.
1.70%
KLA Corp.
1.68%
IWB
NVIDIA Corp.
6.72%
Apple, Inc.
6.03%
Microsoft Corp.
3.99%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.33%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.00%
Broadcom Inc.
2.53%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.42%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.87%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.78%
Tesla, Inc.
1.77%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.38%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.36%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.34%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.26%
Intel Corp.
0.88%
Frequently asked questions about FLQL and IWB
How have the FLQL and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, FLQL is up 13.02% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has returned 11.52%. That puts FLQL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLQL or IWB?
Year-to-date, the FLQL ETF saw +$159M in flows, compared to -$2.06B for IWB.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLQL or IWB?
Over the past year, FLQL had a volatility of 14.12%, while IWB experienced 12.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLQL or IWB?
As of August 3, 2026, FLQL holds $2.07 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $49.02 B.
What sectors do the FLQL and IWB ETFs invest in?
FLQL leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FLQL ETF and IWB ETF?
FLQL top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp.. IWB holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLQL or IWB?
FLQL holds 214 securities with 44.13% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1023 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.67%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
