FLJHvsGSJYETF Comparison
VS
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. FLJH's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, GSJY's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. FLJH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.25% for GSJY. FLJH is up 21.22% year-to-date (YTD) with +$92M in YTD flows. GSJY performs worse with 19.61% YTD performance, and +$21M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLJH and GSJY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLJH vs GSJY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLJH GSJY | -3.95%-0.97% | -0.38%+4.22% | +21.22%+19.61% | +33.77%+23.97% | +98.01%+66.03% | +152.80%+49.24% |
| Flows | FLJH GSJY | +$27M+$11M | +$59M+$11M | +$92M+$21M | +$100M+$21M | -$61M+$60M | +$165M+$60M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLJH GSJY | +20.14%+19.73% | +20.89%+21.71% | +21.61%+22.58% | +19.46%+20.90% |
| Max drawdown | FLJH GSJY | -5.44%-5.20% | -11.13%-14.04% | -25.01%-18.92% | -25.01%-32.64% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLJH GSJY | 50d43d | 71d173d | 321d235d | 321d902d |
Trading data
FLJH | GSJY | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.33 | $55.53 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $45.53 | $56.00 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLJH | GSJY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLJH | GSJY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.33 | $55.53 |
| 1D performance | -0.45% | -0.84% |
| AuM | $225.55 M | $99.20 M |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
FLJH | GSJY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 474 | 154 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 2, 2017 | March 2, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLJH
Japan
100%
Other
0%
GSJY
Japan
99.81%
Other
0.19%
Sectors
FLJH
Technology
21.92%
Finance
21.48%
Industrials
18.77%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.97%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.18%
Other
19.67%
GSJY
Finance
22.32%
Technology
21.55%
Industrials
18.99%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.72%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.81%
Other
19.62%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLJH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.31%
GSJY
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FLJH
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
4.10%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.16%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.74%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.60%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.21%
Sony Group Corp.
2.10%
Advantest Corp.
2.05%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
2.01%
SoftBank Group Corp.
1.99%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
1.82%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.68%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.54%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.52%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
1.40%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.39%
GSJY
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
4.70%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
3.36%
Advantest Corp.
3.09%
Toyota Motor Corp.
2.89%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.76%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.68%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
2.37%
Sony Group Corp.
2.29%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.99%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.87%
SoftBank Group Corp.
1.82%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.66%
ENEOS Holdings, Inc.
1.50%
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
1.44%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
1.43%
Frequently asked questions about FLJH and GSJY
How have the FLJH and GSJY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, FLJH is up 21.22% year-to-date (YTD), while GSJY has returned 19.61%. That puts FLJH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLJH or GSJY?
Year-to-date, the FLJH ETF saw +$92M in flows, compared to +$21M for GSJY.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLJH or GSJY?
Over the past year, FLJH had a volatility of 20.89%, while GSJY experienced 21.71%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLJH or GSJY?
As of September 15, 2026, FLJH holds $225.55 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSJY manages $99.20 M.
What sectors do the FLJH and GSJY ETFs invest in?
FLJH leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, GSJY focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FLJH ETF and GSJY ETF?
FLJH top holdings include Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corp. and Tokyo Electron Ltd.. GSJY holds in its top three: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Tokyo Electron Ltd. and Advantest Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLJH or GSJY?
FLJH holds 474 securities with 32.31% of its assets in the top 15. GSJY has 154 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.84%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
