FLJHvsDBJPETF Comparison
VS
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. FLJH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.45% for DBJP. FLJH is up 21.22% year-to-date (YTD) with +$92M in YTD flows. DBJP performs better with 21.79% YTD performance, and +$165M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLJH and DBJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLJH vs DBJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLJH DBJP | -3.95%-4.03% | -0.38%-0.15% | +21.22%+21.79% | +33.77%+34.64% | +98.01%+96.88% | +152.80%+149.71% |
| Flows | FLJH DBJP | +$27M+$11M | +$59M+$40M | +$92M+$165M | +$100M+$147M | -$61M+$146M | +$165M+$189M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLJH DBJP | +20.14%+20.57% | +20.89%+21.50% | +21.61%+22.70% | +19.46%+20.30% |
| Max drawdown | FLJH DBJP | -5.44%-6.13% | -11.13%-11.18% | -25.01%-25.81% | -25.01%-25.81% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLJH DBJP | 50d51d | 71d71d | 321d350d | 321d350d |
Trading data
FLJH | DBJP | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.33 | $114.21 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $45.53 | $114.50 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLJH | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLJH | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.33 | $114.21 |
| 1D performance | -0.45% | -0.25% |
| AuM | $225.55 M | $704.34 M |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.45% |
Characteristics
FLJH | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index | MSCI Japan Index |
| N° of holdings | 474 | 168 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 2, 2017 | June 8, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLJH
Japan
100%
Other
0%
DBJP
Japan
98.01%
Other
1.99%
Sectors
FLJH
Technology
21.92%
Finance
21.48%
Industrials
18.77%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.97%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.18%
Other
19.67%
DBJP
Technology
22.12%
Finance
21.69%
Industrials
18.37%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.78%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.42%
Other
20.62%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLJH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.31%
DBJP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
37.37%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FLJH
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
4.10%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.16%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.74%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.60%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.21%
Sony Group Corp.
2.10%
Advantest Corp.
2.05%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
2.01%
SoftBank Group Corp.
1.99%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
1.82%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.68%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.54%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.52%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
1.40%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.39%
DBJP
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
4.77%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.48%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
3.07%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
3.06%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.63%
Sony Group Corp.
2.61%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
2.37%
SoftBank Group Corp.
2.31%
Advantest Corp.
2.28%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.04%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.86%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.80%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.76%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
1.70%
KEYENCE Corp.
1.63%
Frequently asked questions about FLJH and DBJP
How have the FLJH and DBJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, FLJH is up 21.22% year-to-date (YTD), while DBJP has returned 21.79%. That puts DBJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLJH or DBJP?
Year-to-date, the FLJH ETF saw +$92M in flows, compared to +$165M for DBJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLJH or DBJP?
Over the past year, FLJH had a volatility of 20.89%, while DBJP experienced 21.5%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLJH or DBJP?
As of September 15, 2026, FLJH holds $225.55 M in assets under management (AUM), while DBJP manages $704.34 M.
What sectors do the FLJH and DBJP ETFs invest in?
FLJH leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, DBJP focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FLJH ETF and DBJP ETF?
FLJH top holdings include Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corp. and Tokyo Electron Ltd.. DBJP holds in its top three: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corp. and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLJH or DBJP?
FLJH holds 474 securities with 32.31% of its assets in the top 15. DBJP has 168 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.37%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FLJH & DBJP
Advertisement
