FLDBvsOACPETF Comparison
VS
Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) belongs to the Money Market Bonds segment. OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) is part of the US Aggregate Bonds segment. FLDB's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Sovereign and Industrials. In contrast, OACP's top sector exposures are Industrials, Finance and Sovereign. FLDB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.74% for OACP. FLDB is up 2.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$29M in YTD flows. OACP performs worse with -0.38% YTD performance, and +$59M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLDB and OACP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLDB vs OACP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLDB OACP | +0.28%+0.48% | +0.90%-0.42% | +2.35%-0.38% | +3.87%+2.22% | n/a+13.98% | n/an/a |
| Flows | FLDB OACP | +$3M+$2M | +$9M+$9M | +$29M+$59M | +$38M+$88M | -+$162M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLDB OACP | +0.38%+3.37% | +0.33%+3.37% | n/a+4.70% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FLDB OACP | -0.03%-1.77% | -0.08%-2.64% | n/a-4.62% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FLDB OACP | 4d63d | 17d183d | n/a88d | n/an/a |
Trading data
FLDB | OACP | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $50.23 | $22.28 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $50.24 | $22.27 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLDB | OACP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.23 | $22.28 |
| 1D performance | -0.02% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $417.78 M | $267.84 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.74% |
Characteristics
FLDB | OACP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Fidelity | OneAscent Investments |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 220 | 181 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 22, 2024 | March 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLDB
USA
59.33%
Other
40.67%
OACP
USA
55.18%
Other
44.82%
Sectors
FLDB
Finance
36.62%
Sovereign
27.36%
Other
36.02%
OACP
Industrials
18.12%
Finance
16.26%
Sovereign
14.25%
Utilities
9.73%
Other
41.65%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLDB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.46%
OACP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.45%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FLDB
USA, Notes 4.125% 31jan2027, USD (AW-2027)
8.71%
USA, Notes 3.625% 31aug2027, USD (BG-2027)
7.00%
USA, Notes 3.375% 31dec2027, USD (BM-2027)
6.06%
USA, Notes 3.75% 30apr2028, USD (BA-2028)
4.16%
Fidelity Cash Central Fund
2.73%
USA, Notes 3.5% 30sep2026, USD (BH-2026)
1.43%
JP Morgan, 6.07% 22oct2027, USD
0.39%
Goldman Sachs, 1.948% 21oct2027, USD
0.39%
Toronto-Dominion Bank, 4.568% 17dec2026, USD (C)
0.37%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, 5.017% 20jul2028, USD
0.37%
US33884EAQ44
0.37%
U.S. Bancorp, 6.787% 26oct2027, USD (CC)
0.37%
HSBC Holdings plc, 2.251% 22nov2027, USD
0.37%
VMware, 1.4% 15aug2026, USD
0.37%
Wells Fargo, 4.9% 24jan2028, USD (W)
0.37%
OACP
USA, Bonds 5% 15may2046, USD
5.28%
USA, Notes 4.125% 30jun2028, USD (BD-2028)
3.06%
USA, Bonds 4.75% 15feb2056, USD
1.65%
FN MA5353, 5.5% 1may2054, USD (ABS)
1.54%
USA, TIPS 1.25% 15apr2031, USD (X-2031)
1.39%
G2 MA8149, 3.5% 20jul2052, USD (ABS)
1.15%
Topaz Solar Farms, 5.75% 30sep2039, USD (A)
1.04%
USA, Notes 4.375% 15may2036, USD (C-2036)
1.00%
FN MA4579, 3% 1apr2052, USD (ABS)
0.88%
FN MA5331, 5.5% 1apr2054, USD (ABS)
0.76%
Export Development Canada, 4.75% 5jun2034, USD (24-41)
0.76%
US123915AE08
0.76%
City of New York, 5.281% 1feb2038, USD (2026)
0.74%
US3132DWHE66
0.72%
FN MA4626, 4% 1jun2052, USD (ABS)
0.71%
Frequently asked questions about FLDB and OACP
How have the FLDB and OACP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 1, 2026, FLDB is up 2.35% year-to-date (YTD), while OACP has lost -0.38%. That puts FLDB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLDB or OACP?
Year-to-date, the FLDB ETF saw +$29M in flows, compared to +$59M for OACP.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLDB or OACP?
Over the past year, FLDB had a volatility of 0.33%, while OACP experienced 3.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLDB or OACP?
As of September 1, 2026, FLDB holds $417.78 M in assets under management (AUM), while OACP manages $267.84 M.
What sectors do the FLDB and OACP ETFs invest in?
FLDB leans toward sectors like Finance and Sovereign. Meanwhile, OACP focuses on Industrials, Finance and Sovereign.
What are the top holdings of the FLDB ETF and OACP ETF?
FLDB top holdings include USA, Notes 4.125% 31jan2027, USD (AW-2027), USA, Notes 3.625% 31aug2027, USD (BG-2027) and USA, Notes 3.375% 31dec2027, USD (BM-2027). OACP holds in its top three: USA, Bonds 5% 15may2046, USD, USA, Notes 4.125% 30jun2028, USD (BD-2028) and USA, Bonds 4.75% 15feb2056, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: FLDB or OACP?
FLDB holds 371 securities with 33.46% of its assets in the top 15. OACP has 277 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.45%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
