FLCHvsMCHETF Comparison
VS
Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. FLCH's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, MCH's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. FLCH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.79% for MCH. FLCH is down -10.89% year-to-date (YTD) with +$75M in YTD flows. MCH performs better with -2.89% YTD performance, and -$580K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLCH and MCH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLCH vs MCH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/14/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLCH MCH | -1.98%-2.95% | -3.70%-7.75% | -10.89%-2.89% | -14.82%-5.52% | +30.97%+37.43% | -13.49%n/a |
| Flows | FLCH MCH | -$8M-$580K | +$57M-$580K | +$75M-$580K | +$123M-$1M | +$191M-$13M | +$222M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLCH MCH | +19.40%+23.61% | +19.56%+22.57% | +23.26%+25.42% | +26.44%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FLCH MCH | -8.75%-9.58% | -22.50%-15.02% | -22.50%-23.38% | -49.77%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FLCH MCH | 45d84d | 347d228d | 347d309d | 1422dn/a |
Trading data
FLCH | MCH | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.91 | $27.71 |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $21.12 | $27.65 |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCH
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFLCH | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLCH | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.91 | $27.71 |
| 1D performance | -0.99% | +0.23% |
| AuM | $316.49 M | $21.50 M |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.79% |
Characteristics
FLCH | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | Matthews Asia |
| Benchmark | FTSE China RIC Capped Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 893 | 52 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 2, 2017 | July 13, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLCH
China
91.37%
Other
8.63%
MCH
China
88.38%
Other
11.62%
Sectors
FLCH
Technology
25.27%
Finance
21.73%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
15.64%
Industrials
7.78%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.36%
Other
22.22%
MCH
Finance
27.26%
Technology
26.59%
Industrials
12.03%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.27%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.75%
Other
16.11%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLCH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.86%
MCH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.79%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FLCH
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
12.67%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
9.30%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.64%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.66%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.35%
Xiaomi Corp.
2.27%
Meituan
2.25%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.68%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.66%
NetEase, Inc.
1.59%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.51%
JD.com, Inc.
1.35%
Baidu, Inc.
1.02%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.97%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
0.93%
MCH
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
13.52%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
6.64%
Meituan
4.73%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
3.21%
China International Capital Corp. Ltd.
3.03%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
2.96%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
2.84%
JD.com, Inc.
2.80%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
2.78%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.74%
Jiangsu Zhongtian Technology Co., Ltd.
2.68%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
2.31%
China Merchants Securities Co., Ltd.
2.25%
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.
2.17%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.12%
Frequently asked questions about FLCH and MCH
How have the FLCH and MCH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 14, 2026, FLCH is down -10.89% year-to-date (YTD), while MCH has lost -2.89%. That puts MCH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLCH or MCH?
Year-to-date, the FLCH ETF saw +$75M in flows, compared to -$580K for MCH.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLCH or MCH?
Over the past year, FLCH had a volatility of 19.56%, while MCH experienced 22.57%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLCH or MCH?
As of September 14, 2026, FLCH holds $316.49 M in assets under management (AUM), while MCH manages $21.50 M.
What sectors do the FLCH and MCH ETFs invest in?
FLCH leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, MCH focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FLCH ETF and MCH ETF?
FLCH top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp.. MCH holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Meituan.
Which ETF is more diversified: FLCH or MCH?
FLCH holds 998 securities with 45.86% of its assets in the top 15. MCH has 53 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.79%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FLCH & MCH
Andrew Mattock - Matthews China Active ETF (MCH)
March 15, 2023
MCH
Exploring fresh dividend investing strategies and foreign stocks
September 17, 2022
MCH
Advertisement
Advertisement
