FLCHvsKBAETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF
This fund is part of
China Blended Cap
+0.15%
Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF (KBA) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. FLCH's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, KBA's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. FLCH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.79% for KBA. FLCH is down -7.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$48M in YTD flows. KBA performs better with 7.03% YTD performance, and -$91M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLCH and KBA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLCH vs KBA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLCH KBA | +7.52%-3.90% | -2.91%-0.42% | -7.27%+7.03% | -0.73%+30.55% | +22.83%+40.51% | -11.59%+6.14% |
| Flows | FLCH KBA | +$34M-$5M | +$30M-$45M | +$48M-$91M | +$101M-$92M | +$164M-$273M | +$201M-$266M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLCH KBA | +21.49%+26.51% | +19.84%+19.95% | +23.40%+19.24% | +26.68%+20.09% |
| Max drawdown | FLCH KBA | -14.72%-8.43% | -22.50%-8.43% | -25.91%-22.60% | -50.43%-45.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLCH KBA | 85d38d | 302d38d | 422d423d | 1485d1604d |
Trading data
FLCH | KBA | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.18 | $33.11 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $22.07 | $33.37 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLCH | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLCH | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.18 | $33.11 |
| 1D performance | +0.50% | -0.78% |
| AuM | $303.01 M | $145.37 M |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.79% |
Characteristics
FLCH | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | FTSE China RIC Capped Index | MSCI China A 50 Connect Index |
| N° of holdings | 893 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 2, 2017 | March 4, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLCH
China
91.25%
Other
8.75%
KBA
China
99.24%
Other
0.76%
Sectors
FLCH
Technology
26.42%
Finance
21.69%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
14.33%
Industrials
8.32%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.05%
Other
22.18%
KBA
Technology
38.86%
Industrials
17.22%
Finance
16.02%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.28%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.08%
Other
13.54%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLCH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.2%
KBA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
61.71%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
FLCH
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
12.69%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.07%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.60%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.60%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.28%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.83%
Meituan
1.75%
NetEase, Inc.
1.69%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.69%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.62%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.33%
JD.com, Inc.
1.17%
Baidu, Inc.
1.04%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.99%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
0.88%
KBA
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
8.51%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
7.24%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
5.13%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
5.01%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
4.41%
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd.
4.33%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
4.33%
Foxconn Industrial Internet Co., Ltd.
3.92%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
3.29%
CMOC Group Ltd.
2.97%
Luxshare Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
2.63%
BYD Co., Ltd.
2.51%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
2.49%
Suzhou Dongshan Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
2.47%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
2.47%
Frequently asked questions about FLCH and KBA
How have the FLCH and KBA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 31, 2026, FLCH is down -7.27% year-to-date (YTD), while KBA has returned 7.03%. That puts KBA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLCH or KBA?
Year-to-date, the FLCH ETF saw +$48M in flows, compared to -$91M for KBA.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLCH or KBA?
Over the past year, FLCH had a volatility of 19.84%, while KBA experienced 19.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLCH or KBA?
As of July 31, 2026, FLCH holds $303.01 M in assets under management (AUM), while KBA manages $145.37 M.
What sectors do the FLCH and KBA ETFs invest in?
FLCH leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, KBA focuses on Technology, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the FLCH ETF and KBA ETF?
FLCH top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp.. KBA holds in its top three: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd., Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd. and Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLCH or KBA?
FLCH holds 998 securities with 43.2% of its assets in the top 15. KBA has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.71%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FLCH & KBA
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KBA
Advertisement
Advertisement
